Was Joseph Kennedy Really an Anti-Semite?Google Questions
tags: Joseph Kennedy, anti-Semitism, Kennedys
Fatima Ahmed-Farouta is a former HNN intern.
Credit: Wiki Commons.
Was Joseph P. Kennedy, the father of President John F. Kennedy, really an anti-Semite?
David Nasaw, Kennedy's recent biographer, defined an anti-Semite, for the purposes of his book The Patriarch, as "someone who believes that there's something in the genetic makeup -- in the blood -- of Jews that makes them sinister, corrupt, and committed to destroying Christian morality." Under this definition, Charles Lindbergh and Henry Ford were anti-Semites, as were other officials in the State Department. Kennedy, he argued, was not an anti-Semite in that sense.
But Nasaw admitted that Kennedy believed in a Jewish conspiracy to push the United States into an unnecessary war with Germany. And as ambassador to the United Kingdom from 1938 to 1940, he was in a position -- even if he wasn't a believer in "scientific" anti-Semitism -- to do far more damage to European Jews than his stateside contemporaries.
A wealthy and influential man in political circles, Joseph Kennedy was appointed ambassador to Great Britain by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, and according to Richard Breitman and Allan Lichtman, both professors at American University in Washington, D.C. and authors of the recent book FDR and the Jews, his unlikely appointment (Kennedy was an Irish Catholic) was because Roosevelt wanted Kennedy out of Washington. Parts of British society, in which Kennedy found himself enjoyably immersed, argued that appeasement of Hitler was the best option. This was not uncommon thinking at the time, and indeed appeasement was the official policy of the British government until 1939. Kennedy, on his arrival at London became affiliated with the aristocratic “Cliveden Set,” who were not only pro-appeasement, but also in favor of improved relationships between Great Britain and Nazi Germany. Before long, his views on how to deal with Hitler mirrored those of the circle.
In late 1938, the Intergovernmental Committee on Refugees was established at the instigation of President Roosevelt to find ways of addressing the German refugee question. FDR asked British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain to reason with Hitler to allow German Jews out of the country, with at least some of their possessions in order to finance their new lives abroad. Kennedy, as the ambassador, was tasked with passing the message to Chamberlain,, but instead of delivering the message personally, Kennedy passed the message on in writing, then said in an interview to The Nation that he was all for the committee so long as it did not stand in the way of other interests.
On Kristallnacht -- the Night of Broken Glass, November 9-10, 1938 -- one hundred Jews were murdered in Germany, and about 30,000 Jewish men were rounded up and sent to concentration camps. This was officially sanctioned by the Nazi government, and by now the writing was on the wall for German Jews. The governments of the United States and Great Britain were shocked but were unable to arrive at quick solution to getting Jews out of Germany. As FDR lobbied Congress to increase in the quota for refugees, amid a domestic political climate rife with anti-Semitism, the press reported that Kennedy seemed to have his own refugee plan. No one seemed to know what that entailed, however. What was clear was that the Kennedy position was appeasement and the development of business ties with Germany.
Hjalmar Schacht, president of the German Reichsbank, proposed after Kristallnacht that Jews would be allowed to leave Germany with some amount of property in exchange for foreign economic concessions, and both Breitman and Lichtman argue that the proposal was in effect a ransoming of Jews. Schacht’s proposal was widely criticized -- except by Joseph Kennedy, who is on record to have said in a conversation with the British Jewish activist Neville Laski that the appeasement of Hitler was positive, as it would intensify economic ties between the two sides, and act as a barrier to war. Kennedy further stated that it was a win-win situation for all. Kennedy blamed the Jews for the German problem, and he is reported to have said that the lives of Jews in Central Europe were not really worth all the agitation. The only reason why they needed to be allowed out of Germany was to avert war as their continued stay in Germany “were a festering sore leading to international complications straight along the path of war... the world’s most difficult and dangerous problem.”
comments powered by Disqus
- ‘If You Want to Experience Liberation, Black Women Must Be at the Table’
- A Century After a Race Massacre, Tulsa Finally Digs for Suspected Mass Graves
- Historians Will Likely Rank Trump as One of the Worst Presidents
- Black Lives Matter Movement Prods Bethlehem and Other Districts to Review How History is Taught
- During the Civil War, the Enslaved Were Given an Especially Odious Job. The Pay Went to Their Owners.
- Is Evangelical Support for Trump a Contradiction?
- Survival Of The Kindest: Can Our Better Nature Help Us Build A Better World?
- As Monuments Tumble, Are We ‘Erasing’ History? Historians Say No
- Historical Association Schools Teachers on White House History
- MIT Professor Tunney Lee, an Architect, Urban Planner, and Historian of Chinatown, Dies at 88