Daniel Pipes: Finally We Are on a More Realistic Path in Iraq
Daniel Pipes, writing in the Jerusalem Post (Nov. 19, 2003):
Stay the course but change the course. That was the meaning of the sudden, sharp, and understated change in Washington's Iraq policy last week.
After the American civilian administrator of Iraq, L. Paul Bremer III, made a hurried visit to the White House, President George W. Bush said he wants "the Iraqis to be more involved in the governance of their country" and offered some ideas toward that end. Two days later, the Iraqi Governing Council announced that the formal occupation of Iraq would end by June 2004, becoming at that time a mere "military presence."
Ambitious plans for an early constitution have now been shunted aside; instead, reports the Associated Press, Bremer will "name an interim Iraqi leader with authority to govern the country until a constitution can be written and elections held."
The military will be "Iraqified." The new emphasis is less on establishing a Jeffersonian democracy than on shifting power and responsibility to Iraqis, and doing so pronto.
This welcome shift marks a victory for the Defense Department's realism and a defeat for the State Department's dreamy hope (as the Wall Street Journal puts it) "to re-create the Philadelphia of 1787 in Baghdad." Sure, it would be wonderful if Americans and Britons could, in leisurely fashion, educate Iraqis in the fine arts of governance. But Iraqis are not children eager to learn from Western instructors. They are proud of their history, defiant toward the outside world, suspicious of Anglo-Americans, and determined to run their own country. Attempts to tutor them will surely fail.
Iraqi today is deeply dissimilar to Germany or Japan post-1945, primarily because a very different equation exists.
- Germans and Japanese were each defeated as a people, ground down by a multi-year
total war, and so they accepted the remake of their societies and cultures.
In contrast, Iraqis emerged almost unscathed from a three-week war designed
not to harm them. Feeling liberated more than defeated, Iraqis are in no mood
to be told what to do. They take what serves them from the occupation and
fend off, through violence and other forms of resistance, what does not.
- Conversely, not having gone through a long and brutal war with Iraqis, Americans
display limited concern about the future course of Iraq.
In brief, Iraqi determination is much greater than that of the occupiers, severely limiting what the latter can accomplish.
Washington's sensible new approach is in keeping with my call in April 2003
for a "politically moderate but operationally tough democratically-minded
Iraqi strongman," as well as my recommendation to let Iraqis run Iraq.
comments powered by Disqus