Aussie scholar says historians are neglecting storyteller role
HISTORY has been "dulled down" by focusing exclusively on analysing evidence and argument, with historians neglecting their role as storytellers.
Award-winning historian Peter Cochrane is urging his colleagues to look to the narrative techniques of literature to recreate the past in a vivid and lively way.
Cochrane, an inaugural winner of the Prime Minister's Prize for Australian History, said historians should be able to cross freely into the territory of novelists and poets to use their techniques of plot, character, and imagination.
"We spend a great deal of our time on the intricacies of analysis, evidence evaluation and argument while we tend to neglect the literary side of history writing," he says in a speech prepared for this week's Australian History Teachers Association annual conference in Brisbane.
"This, I think, is an old, ingrained prejudice. Historians tend to see themselves as social scientists, as scholars whose job it is to 'write up' or report on their findings, rather than as writers whose job it is to create or imagine the past, to captivate anaudience.
"We should be crossing boundaries and borrowing what we can from fiction, or at least from fiction writers ... in terms of structuring and vivifying a story."
comments powered by Disqus
Herbert Barger - 5/22/2009
Historians should write what they consider history in a truthful and WELL researched manner. Some recent historians writing books on the Jefferson-Hemings DNA Study are completely "out on a limb", YET they win fancy book awards.Is it familiarity with the subject or the book judges that are misleading the public? If interested in truthful and detailed inside reporting on this controversy please click on: www.tjheritage.org and www.jeffersondna.com.
Please watch for a hard hitting behind the scenes book, "In Defense of Thomas Jefferson, The Sally Hemings Sex Scandal." The book is due out June 9, 2009.
Jefferson Family Historian
Founder, The Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society
Gregory Canellis - 10/2/2008
There has always been a fine line between good historical analysis and exciting story-telling. Here in the USA, my pet peeve are journalists who think they are historians. They have at their disposal the best editing teams money can buy. The result, exciting narrative with less than standard historical methods. Some academic historians, however, tend to lean the other way: good historical methods coupled with dull writing. What historians must remember is their responsibility to teach history through good story telling, and stop concentrating so much on writing for their fellow historians.
- T. rex fossils arrive at Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History
- Quote of the Day -- Time Magazine's Top 100 People
- Investigation: The Resegregation of America's Schools
- 5 Explosive Revelations Leaked from Senate Report Exposing CIA Torture
- In Parts of the South, Glorifying Slavery No Longer Pays the Bills
- UC Berkeley professor emeritus Robert Harlan dies at 84
- She Came All the Way from Melbourne to Attend the OAH
- The 7 Most Popular HNN Videos from the 2014 OAH
- Jesse Lemisch’s up-from-below history is still strikingly original
- U.Va. Historian Alan Taylor Wins 2014 Pulitzer for Book on Slaves and War -- His second Pulitzer!