Who Killed Alexander The Great?
Steve Connor, The Independent (London), 04 Oct. 2004
He Conquered most of the known world and created the biggest empire in ancient history. Yet Alexander the Great's sudden death at the age of 32 has been a mystery for centuries. Some experts say he died of malaria, others suggest a bout of typhoid caused by tainted food, or chronic liver poisoning brought on by his bacchanalia.
But the latest theory suggests he was the victim of a plot by his wife, Roxane. She is said to have poisoned him with what was then a little- known toxin taken from the strychnine plant.
The disclosure will intrigue followers of a historical whodunnit which has fascinated scholars down the ages. It may also prompt more interest in Alexander, who is making something of a comeback in the form of two new Hollywood films. Oliver Stone's movie Alexander the Great, starring Colin Farrell and Sir Anthony Hopkins, is released next month. Another blockbuster - with the same title - by the Moulin Rouge director Baz Luhrmann and starring Leonardo DiCaprio, is expected out in 2006.
The jealous wife theory is being propounded by Graham Phillips, an author of popular history, who believes Alexander was murdered by Roxane in revenge for taking another wife or perhaps flaunting his homosexual lover, Hephaestion, who also died in mysterious circumstances.
He believes that both Hephaestion and Alexander suffered the classic symptoms of strychnine poisoning. Roxane was one of the few people who could have known about the deadly derivative of the strychnine plant Strychnos nux vomica.
What little is known about Alexander's sudden death starts in Babylon, the cultural capital of the ancient world, with a funeral feast held at the end of May in 323BC in honour of the late Hephaestion.
Roman historians, drawing on original accounts of the banquet, suggest that Alexander was gripped by pain before collapsing."The initial symptoms were agitation, tremors, aching or stiffness in the neck, followed by a sudden, sharp pain in the area of the stomach," Mr Phillips says in his new book Alexander the Great: Murder in Babylon, published this week.
"He then collapsed and suffered excruciating agony wherever he was touched. Alexander also suffered from an intense thirst, fever and delirium, and, throughout the night, he experienced convulsions and hallucinations.
"In the final stages he could not talk, although he could still move his head and arms. Ultimately, his breathing became difficult and he fell into a coma and died."
Toxicologists at the University of California told Mr Phillips that the symptoms fit those of poisoning by strychnine, a toxin that interferes with the chemical transmitters of the nerves controlling the body's muscles.
Strychnine would have been unknown in the West at the time because it came from a plant that only grew in the Indus valley, where Alexander has visited two years previously, he said.
Roxane, who accompanied Alexander, took an interest in local customs and is said to have visited a sacred grove where small doses of strychnine could have been used by local priests to induce spiritual hallucinations.
"The one person who know about strychnine was Roxane. She was not only in India, she knew about local customs. I came to the conclusion that she could have killed him," he said.
comments powered by Disqus
abhishek agarwal - 12/1/2004
I have read a lot of documents regarding the mysterious death of alexander the great. However, on this article I would like to say that it is very difficult to believe that the assassination was plotted by ROXANE since she was well aware of Alexander's bi-relationships. Moreover her son would eventually be the heir to the Macedonian throne. By killing alexander the whole empire would fall apart (which did happen ) and she along with her son would be in the most compromising situation as regards to their safety. So that leaves Roxane with no benefit to kill alexander.
One of the theory could be that alexander was assassinated by some king of the Indian sub-continent so that the Greeks can never carry any 2nd invasion. This would seem to justify the origin and usage of the poison given to alexander. Or by Aristotle himself,to avenge the killing of his nephew callisthenes. Either way the macedonian generals were definetly involved in the killing.
Immediately after his death the whole empire was divided among the powerful generals like Ptolomy , Selucus , Perdiccas etc who continuously fought with one another for more power. This proves that their was a lot of power struggle in the Macedonian ranks and someone in the higher up led the plot and finally succeeded.
- New Hampshire professors at odds with library over discarded books
- Troubled history fuels Japan-China tension
- Independent Scotland's last gasp forgotten in Panama jungle
- LBJ was the ‘most-threatened president in American history’
- New exhibit at the World War I Museum ... Over by Christmas: August-December 1914
- Ken Burns on Colbert to promote his new documentary, "The Address"
- UC Santa Barbara History Department featuring a series on the Great Society at 50
- Historians are trying to recover censored texts from World War I poets
- Diane Ravitch blasts the NYT for failing to understand the controversy over Common Core
- Mormon history professors debate atheists in bid to foster greater understanding