With support from the University of Richmond

History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.

Legacies of War: The Korean War – 60 Years On

The Korean War, which began with North Korea’s surprise invasion of South Korea on Sunday, June 25, 1950, lasted for three years.  The hostilities ended with the signing of an armistice agreement in July 1953.  This war broke out only five years after the Korean Peninsula had been liberated from Japanese colonial rule, and only three years after the establishment of separate North and South governments, in a nation divided by foreign powers.  The war’s devastation left much of South Korea in ruins, along with its people in social turmoil.  Sixty years hence, South Korea now strives to play a central role in resolving the common problems of the global community, as evidenced by its hosting of the G-20 Summit in Seoul, in November 2010.

The Korean War was a significant incident in terms of international politics, but it resulted in an even more profound impact on the socio-cultural characteristics of Korean society.  Liberation from Japan’s colonial rule in 1945 was historically significant, and the establishment of the government of the Republic of Korea was a notable development as well, but the Korean War, which began in 1950 and saw an end of outright hostilities under an armistice agreement in 1953, was of such pervasive influence that it has shaped the behavioral patterns, way of thinking, and value systems of South Koreans, as well as the direction of South Korean society’s development, from the time of the war’s outbreak and long thereafter….

Healing the Scars of War

Although the senseless loss of countless people and vast destruction that left much of the country in rubble, the war’s consequences were far more profound.  The hearts of all South Koreans were deeply scarred.  The war and its aftermath exerted a significant influence on the behavioral patterns and ways of thinking of South Koreans for quite some time.  In Japan, the “Fifteen Year War” includes the period that began with the Manchurian Incident in 1931, followed by the Sino-Japanese War in 1937, and ending with Japan’s defeat in the Pacific War in 1945.  Having suffered under Japanese colonial rule during this period, the tension and sense of crisis reached a peak in Korea as well.  Furthermore, it was only a few years after Korea had finally freed itself from Japan’s militarism and wartime mobilization that it experienced national division and the horrors of such a cruel war.  Even after the armistice, the state of confrontation between the South and the North has continued.  In this way, South Koreans have endured decades of tension and struggle to survive.

Through this extreme hardship, South Koreans developed a boundless vitality and resiliency, but also suffered from serious trauma.  Various aspects of the Korean people and their culture, which have been perceived in a negative light, are rooted in the scars of this lengthy period of crises and their experiences with the atrocities of war.  When foreign troops and emissaries came to South Korea, they encountered a people in the midst of a horrific war, before wounds from the “Fifteen Year War” period had even healed.  That Korea’s emergence on the world stage came about due mainly to the Korean War has had a truly unique influence on the formation of perceptions toward Korea and the Korean people.

For many in South Korea, the war led to their first real encounter of life outside their local community, whether through their military service or as refugees, who struggled for survival with complete strangers from across the country.  Amidst this crisis situation and desperate struggle for survival, those who practiced forthrightness were thought to be ineffectual, while a notion took root that anyone who “followed the rules” would not survive.  Under these circumstances, people came to believe that competing fairly and clinging to traditional values would only lead to failure.  Poverty and an abject lack of material possessions encouraged such untoward behavior as cutting in line and resorting to expediency.  There was also a tendency to justify breaking the rules by claiming that the competition was unfair or that others would ignore the rules as well.

Even as the ravaged cities were rebuilt and the people extricated themselves from the depths of poverty through Korea’s economic recovery, the trauma that people experienced due to the horrors of war would take much longer to heal.  Even though the crisis situation had ended, after having endured such a tumultuous everyday life, it was no simple matter for the thoughts and behavior of people to return to a state of normalcy.  Moreover, even the succeeding generation, who did not directly experience the war, could not be free from the influence and memories of their deeply traumatized parents.

Although a number of key issues still need to be resolved, as Koreans commemorate the sixtieth year [since] the start of the Korean War, the wartime trauma has loosened its grip with the passage of time. Even as the state of South-North division and confrontation continues, South Koreans have managed to attain democratization and the peaceful transition of government power.  Freedom of the press has been expanded, along with a notable improvement in the respect for human rights.  For most, there is still cause for concern, but the desperate sense of crisis that had existed for so long is fading away.

Inflow of Refugees

Along with the Korean War’s massive scale and substantial loss of human life, another far-reaching consequence was its displacement of countless people who were forced to abandon their homes.  In most cases, it was not possible for people to relocate in family units; many men left themselves to ensure that the family name would survive, or perhaps because other family members were incapable of making the journey, resulting in vast numbers of separated families.  It has been estimated that some 1.5 million people fled southward during the eight-year period from 1945 (when Korea was liberated from Japanese colonial rule) to 1953, which marked the end of the Korean War.  Moreover, the relocatees are said to have left behind some 4.5 to 6 million family members, equal to a 15-20 percent share of the 1950 population.

People from North Korea most often settled in the cities, which contributed to the South’s urbanization and modernization efforts in the 1950s, although this did result in the emergence of low-income slum areas.  At that time, South Korea’s urban residents accounted for about 24.5 percent of the overall population.  Former North Koreans resettled in large numbers in border regions, such as Sokcho, which drastically altered the local community makeup.

Before liberation, the residents of northwestern Korea were known for being open-minded and progressive, along with being well educated and successful in business, and many of them were Christians.  Since those who fled from the North did so for their survival or to pursue a better life, it was natural for these refugees to bring a strong sense of survival and resiliency to South Korean society.

Many refugees emphasized their anticommunist beliefs and even actively participated in the conservative anticommunism movement in South Korea.  But they also suffered from extreme emotional distress over the family members they left behind, and many were watched carefully by the authorities.  It was only in 1985, thirty-two years after the war’s end, that the first meeting was held to bring together separated family members from South Korea and North Korea.  This was followed by a second reunion in 2000.  There were also those who made their way to the United States for a more secure environment and to pursue the American dream.

Benefits of Education, Military Service

For Koreans, who had acquired a keen appreciation for the importance of education through the painful experience of colonial rule, the war taught them that modern education could well mean the difference in your very survival.  Mandatory military service was postponed for university students during the war and the post-war reconstruction period as well, while English-language competence and modern education were essential to open the doors to employment opportunity and social advancement.  Indeed, material wealth could be destroyed or looted during war, but education was a “secure” asset, as well as a pathway to social status and economic prosperity.  Education has thus determined the fate of entire families.  It could be said that the passion for education among modern-day Koreans may well be attributed to the lessons learned from the Korean War.

Even after the signing of the armistice agreement brought an end to the battlefield hostilities, peace was not established and the state of South-North confrontation continued.  For its security, South Korea was forced to maintain a 600,000-member military, a massive commitment when compared to the nation’s population, and as a result, all Korean men were required to serve in the military.  Due to the war, the ongoing confrontation between South and North, and U.S. military aid, military service provided valuable opportunities for education and training, while the government’s generous support of the military enabled it to secure advanced know-how and organization practices.  Although anticommunist ideology played a notable role, this military-centered environment set the stage for Korea’s military coup d’etat and authoritarian regimes.

For Korean men, military service provided an entrance into society, as the lessons learned about the military’s teamwork, cooperation and organizational principles proved to be of significant value in the civilian sector as well.  Critics claim that military service contributes to an excess of macho tendencies in Korean society and a reinforcement of the patriarchal and authoritarian systems, along with creating obstacles to true democratization.  But the pre-war generation in Japan was known to admire Korean men for their strength of character and fighting spirit, as well as a strong sense of camaraderie, as a result of their military service.  Moreover, they seem to lament an absence of these characteristics in Japan’s post-war generation.