Actresses Oppose Compulsory "Treatment" for Children
From the Associated Press:
Actresses Kirstie Alley and Kelly Preston pleaded with [Florida] lawmakers Tuesday to prohibit schools from denying services to students who won't take mood-altering drugs to treat mental disorders.
Alley sobbed as she told members of the House Education Council the stories of children who committed suicide or died after taking psychotropic drugs....
Children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder can be eligible for special education programs for students with disabilities, including curriculum adjustments, alternative classrooms and increased parent and teacher involvement. The bill would prohibit schools receiving state money to deny those services if those students don't take prescribed drugs to treat the condition.
Alley's pleas, though, came after the committee stripped language from the bill that would have required schools to tell parents that there is no medical test to diagnose a mental disorder and that they can refuse a psychological screening for their children.
The committee also removed part of the bill that would have required schools to inform parents that physical conditions may be the cause of mental and behavioral problems, that they should consult with a medical doctor about such problems and that a diagnosed mental disorder will stay on a student's permanent record.
I guess Alley's and Preston's hearts are in the right places, but a more radical plea might have been more forceful. The bill they back would maintain all the"services" for the"diagnosed" children, and therefore the stigma of"mental disorder." The threat to children from the Therapeutic-Education State would continue.
Hat tip: David Beito.
Cross-posted at The Szasz Blog.
comments powered by Disqus
Brian Radzinsky - 4/22/2005
I agree. Of course we can't hope for something as radical as *gasp* parents having the final say, but anything in that direction is best. And I wonder if the argument can be made that alien clusters are beneficial to the FUTURE O' CHILDREN...
Jason Kuznicki - 4/21/2005
Well said, Sheldon. I don't care for Scientology at all, but they're completely right on this one.
Sheldon Richman - 4/21/2005
I hope that is adopted. It will drive more kids out of the government's indoctrination centers.
Sheldon Richman - 4/21/2005
The article states that quite clearly. Even a broken watch is right two times a day.
Russell Hanneken - 4/21/2005
Kevin Carson - 4/21/2005
If the schools require e-meter scans and compulsory removal of alien clusters, those kids are fucked.
Grant Gould - 4/21/2005
Before you smile too much, you might check if the actresses in question are Scientologists. The Hubbardistas are very fond of this particular argument, and can invariably pollute an otherwise valid argument with the smell of cultishness.
Sad to say, cultists are the foremost opponents of the therapeutic state, and the most common explanation of any opposition to it.
- Five Things You Need to Know to be a Better Digital Preservationist
- Book on Losing British Generals Wins American History Prize
- Stanford scholar explores civil rights revolution's positive impact on the South's economy
- Harvard Historian Nancy Koehn on Amazon's Tentacular Reach
- Q&A with historian and author Nick Turse