Both the Times and the Post have lengthy analysis stories today on how the filibustering fight is weakening the standing of the Senate. In the Post, Dick Meyer (correctly, I think) sees the filibuster as part of a broader decline in the Senate, caused by the elimination of Senate moderates, the 24/7 news cycle, and the tendency to ignore key issues in the name of a"permanent campaign." In the Times, Carl Hulse notes that the two sides seem to be disputing over which party has fallen the furthest in public esteem as a result of this battle.
Both stories are worth reading, especially Meyer's. The nuclear option fight was a needless one, indicative of Bill Frist's shortcomings as majority leader, and at this point, however it comes out, it will leave lasting damage to the institution.
- Poll: Majority Of Americans Say Obama Is Mixed Race, Not Black
- New technology helps paleontologists see Ice-Age bee in intricate detail
- History textbooks in crosshairs of Australia's curriculum wars
- Archaeologists' findings may prove Rome a century older than thought
- 150 years of medical journals to go online
- She Came All the Way from Melbourne to Attend the OAH
- The 7 Most Popular HNN Videos from the 2014 OAH
- U.Va. Historian Alan Taylor Wins 2014 Pulitzer for Book on Slaves and War -- His second Pulitzer!
- UW Professor Stephanie Camp, 46, feminist historian, dies
- Italian forces in WW2 were not soft and Mussolini wasn't a clown, British historian claims