Alexander Speaks Out
The Tennessee senator contended that the academy's lack of intellectual diversity is hampering efforts for sustainable public funding."When I go to talk to people about funding for higher education," he noted,"the single biggest pushback I get is from elected representatives who think that higher education is too one-sided."
Even those not concerned with the current state of staffing patterns in the academy might wonder whether the self-interest of the professoriate might be better served by making a token effort at greater pedagogical and intellectual diversity among the faculty.
comments powered by Disqus
Hiram Hover - 12/13/2005
No, Mr. Lederer: the point is that those who don't accept these criticisms on their merits ought not to make "token" concessions to them on the grounds of self-interest--which is what I understood KC to be suggesting. But I think perhaps you understood that.
John H. Lederer - 12/12/2005
So..one ought refuse to do what you implicitly suggest might be right because of the fear that it would result in demands that one do what is wrong?
Hiram Hover - 12/12/2005
For those on the right, complaints about "liberal bias" in the academy are now so reflexive--and so convenient--that it would take a great deal more than a "token effort" to silence them. My strong suspicious is that such an effort would just be met with escalating demands, which would be difficult to resist, since the initial "token" effort in essence conceded the justice of the underlying complaint.
Rebecca Anne Goetz - 12/12/2005
Inside Higher Ed also covered this, but makes it sound like Alexander was addressing ideological diversity, which of course is different from intellectual diversity (however one might define that) and pedagogical diversity (by which, K.C., I'm assuming you mean teaching, say, for us historian folk, a variety of methodologies for teaching history). From Inside Higher Ed:
But several commission members said that they were surprised (and somewhat dismayed) that the senator had included among his top six priorities for the commission that it seek to rein in the “growing political one-sidedness” and “absence of true diversity of opinion” on most campuses, which he called “the greatest threat to broader public support and funding for higher education.”
“There is more to this charge of one-sidedness than the academic community would like to admit,” Alexander said. “How many conservative speakers are invited to deliver commencement addresses? How many colleges require courses in U.S. history? How many even teach Western Civilization? How many bright, young faculty members are discouraged to earn dissertations in the failure of bilingual education or on the virtues of vouchers or charter schools?"
Somehow I was unaware that teaching U.S. history is a conservative thing to do.
It sounds like Alexander implied that we need a political litmus test in faculty hiring decisions in order to ensure broad public support for higher education. I find that problematic on all sorts of levels.
- While French historians take a common view of WW I, British and German don't
- Historian: Proclamation Naming Pa. State Gun Gets Facts Wrong
- Irish slave owners were compensated historian reveals
- Two historians are in a race against time to preserve early church records from destruction
- Yale's Jay Winter sums up what we should remember about WW I