My colleague Bob Levy debates David Rivkin on NSA surveillance and the divine right of chief executives here (.pdf). Incidentally, I'll start to believe the scare stories about the Federalist Society taking over the world when they work out a way of getting new content on their website in some format other than .pdf.
comments powered by Disqus
Andrew D. Todd - 1/20/2006
The discussion between David Rivkin and Robert Levy seems irrelevant. If as many as five percent of the citizenry decide to resort to technological measures, and the president cannot dissuade them, the NSA will simply drown in encrypted static. The task facing the president is to convince his political opponents that he is willing to play by the constitutional rules, and that they do not need to resort to defensive measures. And if he fails, the result will be a technologically updated version of Lexington and Concord.
I discussed the issue here a few days ago:
You can debate until the cows come home about whether the Royal Prerogative extends to seizing the stores of powder and shot at Concord, or arresting John Hancock and Samuel Adams, but, as it developed, the underlying realities were somewhat different. David Rivkin, with his large claims, impossible of enforcement... well, if he is the President's friend, then who needs enemies?
- Poll: Majority Of Americans Say Obama Is Mixed Race, Not Black
- New technology helps paleontologists see Ice-Age bee in intricate detail
- History textbooks in crosshairs of Australia's curriculum wars
- Archaeologists' findings may prove Rome a century older than thought
- 150 years of medical journals to go online
- She Came All the Way from Melbourne to Attend the OAH
- The 7 Most Popular HNN Videos from the 2014 OAH
- U.Va. Historian Alan Taylor Wins 2014 Pulitzer for Book on Slaves and War -- His second Pulitzer!
- UW Professor Stephanie Camp, 46, feminist historian, dies
- Italian forces in WW2 were not soft and Mussolini wasn't a clown, British historian claims