It's criminal because I say so!
comments powered by Disqus
Robert Higgs - 5/22/2006
I was stunned by this report, too. It struck me first because of the link being made to authority initially granted the government in the Espionage Act of 1917. (I have an ongoing interest, for reasons some of your will understand, in tracing the endless series of such legacies of emergency enactments.)But then I came to Alberto Gonzales's statement, “But it can't be the case that that [First Amendment] right trumps over the right that Americans would like to see, the ability of the federal government to go after criminal activity.” Amazing. Yes, of course the man is a shameless political whore, but you'd think that anybody pretending to serve as the nation's highest legal official would have enough professional pride to demonstrate at least a freshman-level appreciation of the relationship between the Constitution and ANY statute, even one that clearly applies to the matter in question, which it is far from clear is the case in the present matter.
- How Americans Feel About Religious Groups
- Tea Party support linked to educational segregation, new study shows
- History of Philly Rests Under I-95
- Agreement aims to protect North Shore wrecks from looters
- Award-Winning Filmmaker Kevin McCann to Produce the First Film about the Easter Rising in Ireland
- In new book UC Berkeley historian Waldo E. Martin, Jr. takes Black Panther Party's point of view
- Economics historian finds that real social mobility takes hundreds of years
- Historian turns baker?
- Timothy Garton Ash remembers an appearance by Putin at a conference in 1994 that's eye-opening