Historians and Wikipedia
Here, in alphabetical order, from Ancient Egypt to West Virginia, are over 30 other specialized history Wikiprojects, with lists of their contributors. There are, obviously, many gaps -- fields that are not covered. Think of them as opportunities.
comments powered by Disqus
Another Damned Medievalist - 8/3/2007
I think part of it may be that the medievalists were in at the beginning and were gone by the time all the Wikipedia Projects started. Some of the medieval stuff is solid, but some is dire, not necessarily on the facts, but on the interpretations, which are often a good 30 years behind current thinking, with a smattering of ideas that haven't yet gained acceptance.
Ralph E. Luker - 8/2/2007
I'm sorry to hear that professional expertise seemed unwelcome among the medievalist contributors. There must be quite a contrast there with the History of Science and Russian History lists, where academics took the lead and shaped the exchanges.
Another Damned Medievalist - 8/2/2007
Looked through the MA group, and there are very few academics or specialists on the list. Some of the people have been working on the wikipedia for a while and are really sold contributers, but most of the professional medievalists bailed on Wikipedia long ago because their expertise was neither respected nor welcomed by a significant number of people with an interest in the MA. It's good to know that some of the people who did support the idea of expertise are still there, though.
- Journalist Michael Wolraich says he wrote his new book about the Progressives to teach Americans how to do liberal politics
- It’s Martin Kramer vs. Ari Shavit vs. Benny Morris
- It's official: 2014 AHA election results are in
- In new book UC Berkeley historian Waldo E. Martin, Jr. takes Black Panther Party's point of view
- Economics historian finds that real social mobility takes hundreds of years