Is This One of Those "Known Unknowns," or What?
Sometimes the truth comes from the damnedest sources:
SINGAPORE -- The United States and its allies are winning some battles in the terrorism war but may be losing the broader struggle against Islamic extremism that is terrorism's source, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said Saturday.So we already have more than 800 dead Americans, many thousands of wounded Americans, who knows how many dead and wounded Iraqis (we don't really count them, you see, since they don't matter as much), close to $200 billion already spent and counting...and we basically don't know what we're doing?
The troubling unknown, he said, is whether the extremists -- whom he termed"zealots and despots" bent on destroying the global system of nation-states -- are turning out newly trained terrorists faster than the United States can capture or kill them.
"It's quite clear to me that we do not have a coherent approach to this," Rumsfeld said at an international security conference.
Oh, well. That's what most governments do best, isn't it? Kill people and spend money, that is.
I guess this is one of those"known unknowns" that Rumsfeld once talked about. You remember:
The UnknownMore poetry from D.H. Rumsfeld can be found here.
As we know,
There are known knowns.
There are things we know we know.
We also know
There are known unknowns.
That is to say
We know there are some things
We do not know.
But there are also unknown unknowns,
The ones we don't know
We don't know.
—Feb. 12, 2002, Department of Defense news briefing
Wait, though. On reflection, I guess the number of new terrorists being turned out might be an"unknown unknown." It's just so confusing. I knew I should have taken more epistemology courses.
It does make you wonder where Mr. Rumsfeld studied epistemology. Well, following his news conferences and speeches is sort of like a graduate seminar, so I guess it will be alright. It's awfully nice of him to take the time to instruct us in these complexities, don't you think? (The news story via Digby.)
UPDATE: I don't disagree with Steve Horwitz's point, insofar as the epistemological issue alone is concerned. However, context is everything: keep in mind that Rumsfeld offerered this little dissertation (and other similar ones) in justifying a foreign policy based on just such unknowns. And that is precisely the problem, as I discussed in this post for example, about The Fatal Utopian Delusion.
You don't commit soldier's lives, or a nation's financial well-being, or endanger our national security, on the basis of factors which you know you don't know or understand, and which cannot be"planned." So in that larger sense (i.e., the overall political context in which Rumsfeld made these observations), I think it's more than fair to make fun of Rumsfeld. It's the least he deserves. What he actually deserves is far worse.
comments powered by Disqus
mary lili jory - 8/17/2009
I like very much the writings and pictures and explanations in your adress so I look forward to see your next writings.
In the present lively world, food and clothing put on the line in our life have already to obtain the sublimation, life needs the entertainment, in the market shoe's design is all kinds, Women is Dakota and Sundance UGG Boots were the riotous multi-colors, each kinds of color and design are finitely looks like the young women's hairstyle , every day them use the ghd Hair Straightener to changes themself hairstyle,when went out they brought MP3 to wear the fashion to symbolize that Bose in ear headphones and Bose on ear headphones ,let us feel the fashionable news of life.
People to enjoy music, a need for a high-quality sound equipment to show the moving melody to enhance the music quality of life,It is the use of bose headphones.Now bose headphones for sale in hot.
Steven Horwitz - 6/7/2004
Just a quick note to say that I am in agreement with Arthur's "update." It's one thing to talk about the general epistemological point in the context of the market, but entirely another in the context of people's lives. As a context-free statement, it makes logical sense however.