Robert Fisk's The Ghosts of Vietnam
Robert Fisk's telling analysis of the disaster that is Iraq is available here. In March 2003 I found it very difficult to understand how any self-identified libertarian or classical liberal could support the U.S. invasion of Iraq. And now I find it as difficult to comprehend how any such person can support current U.S. policy in that country.
comments powered by Disqus
Sudha Shenoy - 12/30/2004
How would you know you had 'seen it through'/'finished the job'? Seen *what* through? 'Finished' *what* job? This is a recipe for indefinite occupation:there are no criteria to tell us what 'the job' (or 'it') is.Moreover this view presumes that Iraq is a blank slate; the complexities of the historical reality are not even remotely suspected.
Steven Horwitz - 12/30/2004
That argument is particularly ironic if made by classical liberal economists who should not be falling for the sunk cost fallacy that way. I'll gladly play poker with anyone who thinks we should be "in for a penny, in for a pound."
David T. Beito - 12/30/2004
Another variation on this theme is the following: some libertarians(and leftists) concede that U.S. intervention in Iraq was a bad idea but then argue we now have an obligation to "see it through" and "finish the job." I could never see the logic of this antiwar pro-occupation position. If intervening produced negative consequences, wouldn't staying in Iraq only compound these negative consequences?
- Five Things You Need to Know to be a Better Digital Preservationist
- Book on Losing British Generals Wins American History Prize
- Stanford scholar explores civil rights revolution's positive impact on the South's economy
- Harvard Historian Nancy Koehn on Amazon's Tentacular Reach
- Q&A with historian and author Nick Turse