Blogs > Cliopatria > Stumbling to Glory

Feb 3, 2005 7:12 am


Stumbling to Glory



When an antiquated and undemocratic regime falls quickly, those who follow it often do so with little firm idea what they want or how they will achieve it. Slogans --"progress,""prosperity,"" catching up with the rest of the world,""freedom" -- and a sense that there are places in the world where life is better -- though those societies threaten the sovereignty of a nation in flux, while they inspire its inchoate leadership -- are all the plan that really exists. Or perhaps it would be more accurate to suggest that there are many plans, for there are many individuals, each with a distinct (and sometimes small) constituency, who wish to speak to and for the nation. The old regime collapsed quickly but not entirely cleanly (some loyalists will fight on for months; anti-reform insurgencies and assassinations will continue sporadically for a decade), and there are social and legal and cultural obstacles to development, including clan leaders, hereditary classes, and a complete lack of traditions of democracy , civil discourse or universal rights. Sound familiar?

It should: Japan, 1868.

From these unlikely beginnings arose one of the most powerful and important nations of the 20th century.

One of the great challenges of the historian is to remember, and recapture, the lack of inevitability of events. One of my favorite books, because it really was the first one in which I felt that uncertainty reconstructed and revealed, is Michio Umegaki's After the Restoration: The Beginning of Japan's Modern State. One of my great regrets about my undergraduate career is that I did not realize my interest in pursuing history seriously until it was too late for me to take any courses with Prof. Umegaki; we've never met, though our paths have certainly crossed. Umegaki describes the beginnings of the Meiji (1868-1912) state as a series of shifting coalitions, informal working arrangements, rapidly shifting ideas and priorities, policies promulgated by working groups which surprised half the leadership, and generally uncertain steps towards viable governance.

This contrasts sharply with the more conventional backwards looking view of the early Meiji state, which takes in the immensely successful first decade or so and sees in it all the necessary components of development: comprehensive social, legal, administrative, military and economic reforms, which were only shallowly applied at first but which were nonetheless the template for Japan's seemingly meteoric rise to regional power status.

That the Meiji reforms were successful is largely incontrovertible (though we argue about long-term side effects and who should get credit). But that success was not always carefully planned, was rarely coordinated or forseeable. In fact, there are quite a few missteps, and shifts in policy along the way, as well as reforms that succeed in spite of, rather than because of, central (and centralizing) reforms.

There were foreigners, even some Japanese, who doubted Japan's ability to manage its own affairs: Japan was subject to the odious"unequal treaty" system until the 20th century, for example. There were domestic and international observers who found Japan's new leaders cliquish, unrepresentative, unrealistic, ineffective, disunified, oligarchic, and otherwise objectionable. But in spite of their missteps, and in spite of their uncertainties, they did succeed.

[Crossposted at Frog in a Well: Japan]


comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Jonathan Dresner - 2/1/2005

The other really focused study of the subject (and a great reference, really) is an edited volume, a classic and model for anyone producing edited volumes: Jansen and Rozman, Japan in Transition: From Tokugawa to Meiji. My main complaint about that book is precisely what Umegaki corrects: the sense of relative ease in the transition (also that the paperback is out of print). Part of that is trying to deconstruct the idea of an immediate sharp break in 1868, but Umegaki really does go a step beyond it. My advisor Al Craig's article on central government is somewhere in between: fantastic examples of missteps and tensions as well as a somewhat schematic approach to the actual reforms.


Oscar Chamberlain - 2/1/2005

Thank you for this post and the recommendation of Umegaki's book. The Meiji era has always fascinated me, but I have had trouble grasping just how the reforms occurred. As you note, the overviews make it all extremely cerebral and calculated. Obviously this a book to go to for some corrective anwers.

History News Network