Return to HomoRandian.com?

Rand&Homosex (#53000)
by William Marina on February 9, 2005 at 11:48 AM
Dear Chris,
I always appreciate your wit!
I imagined the Great Lady (as masculine as she sometimes appeared) would have made a comment on same.
My own approach was to use Nature/Ethology to attempt to demonstrate that some kinds of behaviors among the same sex in various species do appear to be related to some kind of homosexuality. The bachelor lions with low to no testosterone no longer seemed interested in sex with females.
I also was trying a bit of jest in the opening of my piece, but I am coming to realize that some, Justin R. appears the extreme, are not much into that.To use the word "blatant" to describe something is not necessarioy to condemn it. Again, JR's discussion of his preference in sexual positions is, I think, rather blatant, and not something I would discuss on the Internet.
I would condemn nothing which appears so universal across Nature!
Trying to understand why it is attacked by so many appears to some at our Blog to be condemning it.
Regards,
Bill Marina

Post a Comment

What rules govern discussion boards?

If you have not already done so, you must Sign Up before you can post.








Return to HomoRandian.com?

Subscribe to HNN's newsletter.

Harvard University Press

Tim Matthewson Terrence Roberts

David Stokes

Subscribe to HNN's newsletter.

 

HNN Donations--click here.

Subscribe to HNN's newsletter.

Subscribe to HNN's newsletter.

Just How Stupid Are We? By Rick Shenkman

Subscribe to HNN's newsletter.

Subscribe to HNN's newsletter.

Subscribe to HNN's newsletter.