I've been writing about the rise of the religious right for quite a while now, most recently in connection with the re-election of George W. Bush. Starting with my essay,"Caught Up in the Rapture," I have argued that the political impact of the religious right is second only to its cultural and economic impact, which is growing significantly:
Christian merchandising is a $4.2 billion industry, which includes a $100 million video game business. The Christian book market is particularly lucrative: Evangelist Rick Warren has sold 15 million copies of his book, The Purpose-Driven Life: What on Earth Am I Here For? There are even Christian diet books that sit alongside Atkins and South Beach manuals: The Maker’s Diet helps you to lose weight by eating just like Jesus. From number one best-selling books such as The Da Vinci Code to"Joan of Arcadia" on television and"Bruce Almighty" on the silver screen, God is Hip and Hot. ... A blockbuster film such as"The Passion of the Christ"—which was condemned initially as"anti-Semitic" by some critics—has now grossed nearly $400 million. That figure does not include director Mel Gibson’s cross-promotional merchandising efforts—sales on such items as metal replica crucifixion nails and thorn-adorned necklaces and bracelets. ... [And the] 12-volume LaHaye-Jenkins work—from its first installment, Left Behind, to its action-packed finale, Glorious Appearing: The End of Days—now qualifies as the best-selling Christian fiction book series of all time[, having] sold in excess of 60 million copies in the past nine years.
Ultimately, the Left Behind series is not simply a religious narrative. It is a political one. Glenn W. Shuck, author of Marks of the Beast: The Left Behind Novels and the Struggle for Evangelical Identity, argues persuasively that"the novels have less to do with escaping and more to do with remaking the modern world" (emphasis added). It is the kind of"remaking" that Friedrich Hayek would have characterized as thoroughly rationalist or" constructivist" in its political implications.
Except that in this instance, the"Left Behind-ers" are praying that God will be the ultimate constructivist, and fix things for good. The fact that so many of them voted for George W. Bush as His messenger is not a comforting thought.
Well, God makes a prime-time appearance on NBC in a major network mini-series that begins this Wednesday, April 13, 2005. As Frank Rich puts it (hat-tip to Arthur Silber):"It's all too fitting that 'Revelations,' which downsizes lay government in favor of the clerical, is hijacking the regular time slot of 'The West Wing'" (the show aired its season finale on April 6th). Fitting indeed. The typically liberal"West Wing" is being replaced by a Left Behind knock-off that will merge an"X-Files" sensibility, an Omen-like horror quotient, and an apocalyptic scenario worthy of the Millennium Group.
In the end, of course, the Apocalypse is not the most disturbing prospect; it's the fact that the Apocalypse has become so marketable in this culture.


Re: Fundamentalists v. the Rapture?
Fundamentalists v. the Rapture?
Even some fundamentalists are starting to wonder as indicated by the growing influence of the preterists: http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/8641.html
Re: Fundamentalists v. the Rapture?
Re: Fundamentalists v. the Rapture?
Traditionalist Christianity was virtually unanimous in believing that all the OT prophecies concerning "Israel" were fulfilled in the Church.
Actually, there are conservative evangelicals (mostly Calvinists) around today who have been down on the dispensationalists for years. They (rightly) consider the "Rapturists" to be historical and biblical illiterates, buffoonish marks for the vulgar sideshow of Darby and Scofield.
Re: Fundamentalists v. the Rapture?
Re: Fundamentalists v. the Rapture?
I also wonder if some of this "End of Days" stuff is extra-religious; as cliched as it sounds, there is something to be said about a post-9/11 cultural effect. People who never dreamed that they'd see NYC engulfed by a cloud of ash or downtown Manhattan reduced to rubble have seriously entertained many doomsday scenarios since. So these apocalyptic films might be tapping into something that goes beyond the strictly religious appeal.
BTW, I actually saw the "Left Behind" movies (starring Kirk Cameron from "Growing Pains"!!) on a religious cable TV channel; they are doing much better on DVD and on TV broadcasts than they ever did in their first theatrical run.
Re: Apocalypse Now?!
Re: Apocalypse Now?!
I'd also like to point you on the 2 seasonal series: "Jeremiah" that deals with the problems in a post-apocalyptic America. (It is from the same screenwriter, who wrote Babylon 5 ;) )
Could he get elected?
Re: Could he get elected?
I think you're right, Sheldon. I don't see how any person who declared atheism could possibly be elected to high national office. Not in this climate.
Re: Could he get elected?
Theocracy Watch
Re: Could he get elected?
The latest example I can think of is, Mr. Schröder in Germany, who is Bundeskanzler of Germany and head of the socialist party (SPD). Albeit Mr. Schröder has no particular belief (perhaps out of party guidelines), still is forced to participate in major catholic or protestant chruch services.
Apocalypse Now?!
Re: Apocalypse Now?!
But I think there is some sociological value in taking a look at the current, very specific kinds of apocalyptic visions being promoted today by the religious right, and the impact these visions and other religious doctrines have had on some of the elected officials in the U.S. who think they are doing God's work.
Therein lies the influence and power of certain ideas in shaping public policy and history itself.
Re: Apocalypse Now?!