Given their history, self-described conservatives have an excuse. The self-described libertarians, such as Glenn Reynolds who ran the advertisement, are another matter.

Yes, the point is that it's (a) odd to equate "communist" with "anti-state," and (b) odd for libertarians/conservatives to say that there's anything wrong with being an enemy of the state (or call for a group to be persecuted by the state).

John, I agree with your interpretation of the shirt but not your interpretation of Dave; I took him to mean not "it's odd to have a hammer and sickle next to something you're in favour of" but "it's odd to have a hammer and sickle next to something called enemy of the state." But Dave can clear up for us which way he meant it. (Assuming Dave is a privileged interpreter of his own words ....)

The last comment much too generously implies that the intellectual content of what passes for "conservatism" today is worth taking seriously on grounds other than evidence of intellectual pathology. It is not Burke, it is not Oakeshott, but it does share something with monarchists and theocrats. And of course both like to fantasize BEING the state - as with Louis XIV: "'L'etat c'est moi'" (I am the state).

From this perspective the t-shirt makes perfect sense.