Related Links
- Melvin E. Matthews, Jr: What Is the Difference Between Islam and Islamism?
- Paul Sullivan: Who Are the Shia?
- Timothy Furnish: Ignorance May Be Bliss, but It Makes for Bad Policy: Analysis of the Iraq Study Group Report
The Islam religion was founded by Mohammed in the seventh century. In 622 he founded the first Islamic state, a theocracy in Medina, a city in western Saudi Arabia located north of Mecca. There are two branches of the religion he founded.
The Sunni branch believes that the first four caliphs--Mohammed's successors--rightfully took his place as the leaders of Muslims. They recognize the heirs of the four caliphs as legitimate religious leaders. These heirs ruled continuously in the Arab world until the break-up of the Ottoman Empire following the end of the First World War.
Shiites, in contrast, believe that only the heirs of the fourth caliph, Ali, are the legitimate successors of Mohammed. In 931 the Twelfth Imam disappeared. This was a seminal event in the history of Shiite Muslims. According to R. Scott Appleby, a professor of history at the University of Notre Dame,"Shiite Muslims, who are concentrated in Iran, Iraq, and Lebanon, [believe they] had suffered the loss of divinely guided political leadership" at the time of the Imam's disappearance. Not"until the ascendancy of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1978" did they believe that they had once again begun to live under the authority of a legitimate religious figure.
Another difference between Sunnis and Shiites has to do with the Mahdi, “the rightly-guided one” whose role is to bring a just global caliphate into being. As historian Timothy Furnish has written,"The major difference is that for Shi`is he has already been here, and will return from hiding; for Sunnis he has yet to emerge into history: a comeback v. a coming out, if you will."
In a special 9-11 edition of the Journal of American History, Appleby explained that the Shiite outlook is far different from the Sunni's, a difference that is highly significant:
... for Sunni Muslims, approximately 90 percent of the Muslim world, the loss of the caliphate after World War I was devastating in light of the hitherto continuous historic presence of the caliph, the guardian of Islamic law and the Islamic state. Sunni fundamentalist leaders thereafter emerged in nations such as Egypt and India, where contact with Western political structures provided them with a model awkwardly to imitate ... as they struggled after 1924 to provide a viable alternative to the caliphate.
In 1928, four years after the abolishment of the caliphate, the Egyptian schoolteacher Hasan al-Banna founded the first Islamic fundamentalist movement in the Sunni world, the Muslim Brotherhood (al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun). Al-Banna was appalled by"the wave of atheism and lewdness [that] engulfed Egypt" following World War I. The victorious Europeans had"imported their half-naked women into these regions, together with their liquors, their theatres, their dance halls, their amusements, their stories, their newspapers, their novels, their whims, their silly games, and their vices." Suddenly the very heart of the Islamic world was penetrated by European"schools and scientific and cultural institutes" that" cast doubt and heresy into the souls of its sons and taught them how to demean themselves, disparage their religion and their fatherland, divest themselves of their traditions and beliefs, and to regard as sacred anything Western."14 Most distressing to al-Banna and his followers was what they saw as the rapid moral decline of the religious establishment, including the leading sheikhs, or religious scholars, at Al-Azhar, the grand mosque and center of Islamic learning in Cairo. The clerical leaders had become compromised and corrupted by their alliance with the indigenous ruling elites who had succeeded the European colonial masters.
Osama bin Laden is a Sunni Muslim. To him the end of the reign of the caliphs in the 1920s was catastrophic, as he made clear in a videotape made after 9-11. On the tape, broadcast by Al-Jazeera on October 7, 2001, he proclaimed:"What America is tasting now is only a copy of what we have tasted. ... Our Islamic nation has been tasting the same for more [than] eighty years, of humiliation and disgrace, its sons killed and their blood spilled, its sanctities desecrated."
Juan Cole, a well-known historian of the Middle East, has pointed out on his blog, Informed Comment, that the split between Sunni and Shiites in Iraq is of relatively recent origin:
I see a lot of pundits and politicians saying that Sunnis and Shiites in Iraq have been fighting for a millennium. We need better history than that. The Shiite tribes of the south probably only converted to Shiism in the past 200 year s. And, Sunni-Shiite riots per se were rare in 20th century Iraq. Sunnis and Shiites cooperated in the 1920 rebellion against the British. If you read the newspapers in the 1950s and 1960s, you don't see anything about Sunni-Shiite riots. There were peasant/landlord struggles or communists versus Baathists. The kind of sectarian fighting we're seeing now in Iraq is new in its scale and ferocity, and it was the Americans who unleashed it.
In December 2006 the New York Times reported that it is not just ordinary Americans who find it difficult to remember the difference between Sunnis and Shiites:
SURPRISE quiz: Is Al Qaeda Sunni or Shiite? Which sect dominates Hezbollah?
Silvestre Reyes, the Democratic nominee to head the House Intelligence Committee, failed to answer both questions correctly last week when put to the test by Congressional Quarterly. He mislabeled Al Qaeda as predominantly Shiite, and on Hezbollah, which is mostly Shiite, he drew a blank.
“Speaking only for myself,” he told reporters, “it’s hard to keep things in perspective and in the categories.”
Not that he’s alone. Other members of Congress from both parties have also flunked on-the-spot inquiries. Indeed, some of the smartest Western statesmen of the last century have found themselves flummoxed by Islam. Winston Churchill — in 1921, while busy drawing razor-straight borders across a mercurial Middle East — asked an aide for a three-line note explaining the “religious character” of the Hashemite leader he planned to install in Baghdad.
“Is he a Sunni with Shaih sympathies or a Shaih with Sunni sympathies?” Mr. Churchill wrote, using an antiquated spelling. (“I always get mixed up between these two,” he added.)
And maybe religious memorization should not be required for policymaking. Gen. William Odom, who directed the National Security Agency under President Ronald Reagan, said that Mr. Reyes mainly needs to know “how the intelligence community works.”
Yet, improving American intelligence, according to General Odom and others with close ties to the Middle East and the American intelligence community, requires more than just a organization chart.
A cheat sheet is in order.
The Review asked nearly a dozen experts, from William R. Polk, author of “Understanding Iraq,” to Paul R. Pillar, the C.I.A. official who coordinated intelligence on the Middle East until he retired last year, to explain the region. Here, a quick distillation.
What caused the original divide?
The groups first diverged after the Prophet Muhammad died in 632, and his followers could not agree on whether to choose bloodline successors or leaders most likely to follow the tenets of the faith.
The group now known as Sunnis chose Abu Bakr, the prophet’s adviser, to become the first successor, or caliph, to lead the Muslim state. Shiites favored Ali, Muhammad’s cousin and son-in-law. Ali and his successors are called imams, who not only lead the Shiites but are considered to be descendants of Muhammad. After the 11th imam died in 874, and his young son was said to have disappeared from the funeral, Shiites in particular came to see the child as a Messiah who had been hidden from the public by God.
The largest sect of Shiites, known as “twelvers,” have been preparing for his return ever since.
How did the violence start?
In 656, Ali’s supporters killed the third caliph. Soon after, the Sunnis killed Ali’s son Husain.
Fighting continued but Sunnis emerged victorious over the Shiites and came to revere the caliphate for its strength and piety.
Shiites focused on developing their religious beliefs, through their imams.

Yes and no
However, there is a lot of important truth here that we in the non-Muslim world would do well to remember. When someone actually proposes in the US media, without a hint of irony, that we should invade the Muslim world, kill their leaders and try to convert them to western ideologies, someone in Europe should point out that they went there, did that, and that that is now a very big part of the problem. Media mouthpieces need to find out what is going on before they mouth off. Islam is not some violent sect, but a very complex religious phenomenon. We all need to learn more about it.
RE: Yes and no
AAAAAAHHHHHH!!!
Muhammad did not established two branches of islam
RE: Muhammad did not established two branches of islam
RE: Muhammad did not established two branches of islam
RE: Yes and no
Stevie Free
Freedom
RE: Muhammad did not established two branches of islam
it says there are two branches *of the religion he founded*
i.e. he founded the religion; now there are two branches
Just pondering some thoughts
But we fail to look and raise the issue of their doctrine or maybe perpectives, that anyone or any nation or country that is not Muslim is considered an enemy. And with this enemy, the Muslim is at war. Now who can take away that concept from their thoughts? They have been at war with the Christians. And they are at war until now, all over the world. Hunting, Christians without regards to justice, persecuting and killing.
Yet, the Christians, the morning papers, and the boob tube do gooders does not seem to take notice and stand against these crimes. Is the Christian separating now heinous crime, such as murders in the name of religion from gospel presentation? Or are we going to acquit a relious murderer so that we can evangelize the same person?
Just what can the billions of Christians do so that they can protect their own brotheren?
StevieFree
Stevie Free
sunni and shiite
stevie free
I am not a muslim or a christian but have studied both faiths in detail and what I understand of the Islamic faith is that they are essentially a peaceful race, we in the western world have very short memories about our own histories and the numerous atrocities we committed, but we evolved with out the help of any other civilisation, why cant the Islamic countries be allowed to do the same? why do we feel the need to flood the world with Macdonalds, KFC, Starbucks, strip joints, drugs, liquer stores on every other street corner, prostitutes.....the list goes on and on. Given the choice we wouldn't want bums, alcoholics, junkies and drug dealers hanging round our streets would we???? let these countries evolve at their own pace otherwise we will be killing each other for many more years. fix the palestine and US backed isreal problem and we are half way to making the world a much better place :o)
Peace be upon all mankind.....even you Stevie - cos if you or a member of your family were dying and the only person tha could help was a muslim you would not refuse their help!!!
DX
RE: stevie free
my family got killed
RE: StevieFree
stevie free
try to learn 'bout other religion... u are so bias! and ignorant!
Religion
ignorent
RE: ignorent
STEVIE FREE
RE: Muhammad did not established two branches of islam
RE: Yes and no
RE: Muhammad did not established two branches of islam
RE: Muhammad did not established two branches of islam
RE: Muhammad did not established two branches of islam
Click here
RE: Muhammad did not established two branches of islam
RE: Stevie Free
RE: stevie free
RE: Stevie Free
RE: StevieFree
RE: stevie free
You are correct. My earlier comments were reflective of some very, very poor judgement on my part. Thank for your very informative and balanced comments. I would hope that if I ever needed a hand from a muslim, I would accept (even if I really do not deserve their pity) it.
RE: ignorent
all these comments
RE: all these comments
Is America Good ?
I find it hard to believe sometimes that America is what it was first intended in 1776. With all this useless bickering about who spelled what wrong how are we proving which one of us is more intelligent over the other and better yet why does any of that matter. We can all see that ,as intelligent people we are, at least enough to voice our opinions good or bad. As for America when was the last time we gathered as a nation to stand for anything. I recall from my readings of history that we once stood together for things like equallity, freedoms of rights and speech or religion. I think that Stevie Free's comments might be antagonistic but shed some dark facet of truth we as american's do hold this opinion over all. Unless the polls that they had were infact false, most of America supported the war...hmmm. Which brings another point how is it that no one questions our leaders actions? what if they lie? Can we prove it? Would it matter? is there more to the coincidence that it took more money than any other presidency for Bushes election (sorry court appointment) and most of all his major contributers went bankrupt.Also as they claim banckuptcy ,judges are being appointed to permanent Suprieme Court seats which will give lean to these businesses, but to top it off all people in place to investigate such possible wrong doings have dirty hands in this affair. So now they question is will we come together to demand answers for the obvious mishandlement of Iraq and will Americans now join hands as voters and take back our nation? We should welcome all comments good or bad for this is a nation of freedoms. As for me If Stevie Free is for real, than it is because of his comments that I disagree and without that someone might have assumed I was with him.
bored
HW assignment on Muslim differences...?
RE: my family got killed
school project..
Saddam
what i think
havingfun
Shiites
muslims
muslims
How did you know they were Muslim?
And, have the only people who have been mean to you in your whole life, been these Muslims you talk about?
Tatiana if the answer to that last question was no, that there have been other people (non-Muslim)who have been mean to you, I would ask you one final question.
What religion/ethnicity were the others?
Just a comment, the split in the Islamic religion, is by no means the only religious split based on 1,2, or 3 fundamental, or even minute differing and irreconcilable points of disagreement. And most certainly not the most violent in history either. The split means little on a day to day basis, the Shi'ite community is the majority in Iraq, has been the majority with some 15-20% more people than the Kurds and Arab Sunnai put together, and there has been no major violence between parties there, excluding the Shi'ite attempt against Saddam Hussein's Ba'ath Party rule shortly after the Gulf War, which was not against the Sunnai community, but against Hussein.
However, while it means little in the day to day of things, it means quite a bit more when you consider the formation of a new government, with equal representation and equal balance of power, a shared goal for the benefit of all Iraqi people, and a shift of power to the Shi'ites away from typical Sunni control, since Shi'ites make up the majority of Iraq's populace.
The Shi'ite have already shown themselves weak, and their majority participation in a new government, will surely spell disaster, since without continued protection and intervention by the US, Iraq will be at the mercy of those much stronger than it's proposed new government.
Despite their intentions, history proves their weakness, and I doubt the US is going to play protector for Iraq without reparation, control, and even with that, not indefinitely.
Sunni control would most likely lead to either the US having to firmly take control of the new Iraqi government to quash any attempt by the Iraqi people to create an Islamic state, the backlash of such a suppression by the US would be felt in world opinion, Muslim opinion (worldwide, which is already not favorable, to be nice about it) and the violence it will assure against US targets in retribution for what will surely look like a direct attack against Islam itself.
Or, quite possibly, the Sunni will wait for the US to let it's grip slack, and when it has packed up it's military and left, choose for themselves how they will run Iraq. Insha' Allah.
Just my opinion, nothing more.
the west must...
RE: Is America Good ?