Blogging will be sporadic this week, for obvious reasons. I shouldn't even be doing this.....
But Danny Loss has finally delivered his catalog of errors in Dan Brown's Angels and Demons [as noted in comments, I had the wrong book here], possibly the first to be produced out of non-sectarian pique. I read the book [both books] myself, and found the coded mysteries tiresome, the history tendentious and the writing terribly typical (typically terrible?) of modern mystery/thriller writing in that it not only witholds crucial information from the reader, but it doesn't even attempt to hide the fact that it's doing so in order to provide"twists" later rather than earlier. Not a bad read, though, much like Last Samurai was a good film while being culturally and historically abysmal.
And, after hearing this round sung for years, I finally sat down at a computer and looked it up: it really happened though the water hyacinths may be slightly anachronistic.
Finally, www.kiddierecords.com is reproducing old children's story records digitally. Just in time, for my family.
See you in Seattle!


Re: kiddie errors
Re: kiddie errors
But my wife has fond memories of Robin Hood and Rusty in Orchestraville (I had that one, too) and some of the other things on their schedule. She's been turning her old LP story collection into CDs for our son (most of this stuff just isn't available in newer formats), and it's another source that will reduce our workload.
Re: da Vinci (!) errors?
That's what I get for blogging in a hurry in the middle of a lot of other hurrying....
Thanks,
da Vinci (!) errors?
Re: da Vinci (!) errors?
In Jonathan's defense, The Da Vinci Code and Angels and Demons are kinda the same book. The parallels are so numerous that if you've read one, you'll figure out the second withing 100 pages or so.
kiddie errors
Do you really want to listen to Little Black Sambo's Jungle Orchestra with your kids?