Basic Facts
Teaching Position:
Professor of History, University of Nevada Las Vegas.
Area of Research:
U.S. West, American Thought and Culture, Late Nineteenth- and
Twentieth-Century U.S., Historiography.
Education:
Ph.D., American Intellectual History, Ohio University, June 1991.
Major Publications:
He is the author of Promised Lands: Promotion, Memory and the
Creation of the American West (2002) (a finalist for the Spur
Award for Contemporary Western Non-Fiction), The End of American
Exceptionalism: Frontier Anxiety from the Old West to the New Deal (1993),
along with numerous articles and essays. He is the co-editor of Seeing
and Being Seen: Tourism in the American West (2001); and Many
Wests: Place, Culture, and Regional Identity (1997); and editor
of a Special Issue of The Historian, ";The West Enters
the Twenty-First Century: Appraisals on the State of the Field" (Fall
2004)."
He is currently working on two book projects Global West, American Frontier:
Travelers' Accounts, 1840-2000 (Calvin Horn Book Series, University of New Mexico
Press; manuscript to be submitted in summer 2007), and
The Rebirth of American Exceptionalism: The Cold War, the West, and the Frontier
Revival (sequel to The End of American Exceptionalism).
Also Wrobel is working on a an edited book project Friedrich Gerstäcker's West: A
German Traveler on the Nineteenth-Century American Frontier (for Arthur H. Clark
Company and University of Oklahoma Press).
Awards:
Wrobel is the recipient of numerous awards and fellowships including:
Senior Research Fellow in Western History, Beinecke Library and Lamar Center for the
Study of Frontiers and Borders, Yale University, academic year 2005-2006;
Calvin Horn Lecturer in American Western History and Culture, University of New Mexico,
November 2003;
Promised Lands, Promotion, Memory, and the Creation of the American West (2003
Finalist, Spur Award for Contemporary Non-Fiction, Western Writers of America);
Andrew Mellon Fellow, Huntington Library, Summer 2003;
Los Angeles Corral of Westerners' Fellow, Huntington Library, Summer 2001;
Visiting Scholar, Center of the American West, University of Colorado, Boulder, 1999;
Lindbach Foundation Award for Teaching Excellence, Widener University, 1998;
Cailhouette Fellow, Huntington Library, Summer 1997;
Newberry Library Fellow, Summer 1996;
American Philosophical Society Fellow, Summer 1994;
Baccalaureate Speaker, Hartwick College, May 1994 (chosen by student body);
Mayer Fund Fellow, Huntington Library, Summer 1993;
Haynes Fellow, Huntington Library, Summer 1990.
Additional Info:
Formerly Associate Professor of History (1998-2000); Chair (Fall 1997-Fall 99);
Assistant Professor (1994-98), Widener University,
Visiting Assistant Professor of History, Hartwick College (1992-94),
and Visiting Assistant Professor of History, College of Wooster (1991-92) and Visiting
Instructor (1990-91).
Wrobel is the incoming Vice President (beginning 2007) and President Elect (2008)
of the American Historical Association's Pacific Coast Branch, and is
currently Chair of the Western History Association's (WHA) Membership Committee.
He has also served as President of Phi Alpha Theta, the National History Honor
Society (2004-2006), as a member of the Editorial Board of the Pacific
Historical Review, and on various other professional nominating, program,
book, article, and fellowship prize committees.
A dedicated promoter of partnerships between the academy and the schools,
David Wrobel served as Co-Director of an NEH Institute for teachers on the West
sponsored by the Center of the American West at the University of Colorado at
Boulder (2001); he has been a faculty coordinator and core member for the
Center's Teaching American History (TAH) partnership with the Jefferson County,
Colorado public schools since 2001; he co-directed a TAH summer
institute on the West in Washoe County, Nevada (2003); and he has
participated in the Clark County TAH institute (2005) and the NEH institute
on the West for teachers in Laramie, Wyoming (2006).
Personal Anecdote
Since graduate school I've taught a wide range of courses including: Early American Thought, Modern American Thought, American thought and Culture in the 1920s and 1930s, and American Thought and Culture in the 1950s and 1960s, several courses on western American history and historiography, period courses on the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, US: 1920-1945, and Recent America, historical methodology for undergraduates, the US history survey, and even Colonial and Modern Latin America. I've also taught at a wide range of institutions: as a Visiting Assistant Professor at The College of Wooster in Ohio and at Hartwick College in upstate New York, in a tenure-track position at Widener University, and currently at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, where I am a Professor in the History Department. I've also served as a Visiting Scholar at the Center of the American West at the University of Colorado, Boulder (1999), and as Senior Research Fellow in Western American History at the Beinecke Library and Howard Lamar Center for the Study of Frontiers and Borders at Yale University (2005-2006).
The experience of offering a broad array of classes and spending time at very different academic institutions has proven invaluable. The one piece of advice I would offer to young historians in their first academic positions is to pay close attention to the listing of courses. In my second semester at The College of Wooster, back in 1991, I offered a course titled"The American West: Myth and Reality," which was mis-titled in the Student Course Catalog as"The American West: Myth and Realty." A single letter can make a real difference. A good number of business and economics majors signed up for the course and were quite disappointed to learn that the course had little to do with real estate values in the West. I suppose there's some irony in the fact that my second monograph, Promised Lands: Promotion, Memory, and the Creation of the American West (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2002), does actually deal quite extensively with methods of land promotion in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
Here's a snippet from Promised Lands that illuminates my efforts to present western promoters and pioneer reminiscers in a more nuanced fashion than has generally been the case:
"The two genres [promotion and reminiscence] could be dismissed as, respectively,
the lies of unscrupulous salesmen (there were few female booster writers) and the
improbable recollections of aging frontiersmen and women—the tale tales of nearly
dead white males and females. The promoters could be regarded as the used car dealers
of an earlier age, the reminiscers as the unreliable fisherman chroniclers of yesteryear
whose fish grow ever larger as time recedes and their stories are retold….But it is
important to treat these sources as reflections of the purpose of their creators
rather than as accurate descriptions of past places and events....[T]he issue here...
is their centrality to the processes by which popular perceptions of the West were
constructed, elaborated, disseminated, and sustained."
I guess I too have become something of a promoter -- of historical organizations. My service to the history profession includes a term as President of Phi Alpha Theta, National History Honor Society, Inc. (2004-2006); I am currently Vice-President and President-Elect of the Pacific Coast Branch of the American Historical Association; and I have just been elected to serve a 3-year term on the Council of the Western History Association, an organization that I also serve in the capacity of Chair of the Membership Committee. I've also served on numerous book, article, and fellowship prize committees, and on the Editorial Board of the Pacific Historical Review. These historical organizations that are so vital to the health of the profession are also quite easy to take for granted, and so I would urge young historians to seek service in the organizations in which they are members.
My promotional endeavors also extend to the arena of teacher partnerships. I'm quite heavily involved in building partnerships between college and university teachers and K-12 teachers through NEH and TAH-funded programs. The question I find myself asking again and again is:"Will these partnerships still exist if the TAH funding dries up?" My hope, of course, is that we are building the foundations for healthy long-term collaborative efforts with the school districts that surround our colleges and universities. We are developing Master of Arts in Teaching History programs, conducting summer workshops and institutes, and generally developing a better sense of how we can help K-12 teachers and learn from them.
I'm currently looking forward to my courses on the"Progressive Era" and"Regionalism and the American West" this spring, to my work this summer with the TAH grant in Jefferson County, Colorado (a partnership between the school district and the Center of the American West), to finishing my current book project,"Global West, American Frontier: Travelers' Accounts, 1840-2000," and to beginning my new book project,"The Rebirth of American Exceptionalism: The Cold War, the West, and the Frontier Revival" (a sequel of sorts to my first book, The End of American Exceptionalism: Frontier Anxiety from the Old West to the New Deal (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1993).
Quotes
By David M. Wrobel
About David M. Wrobel
Basic Facts
Teaching Position:
Professor of History, Department of History, The Ohio State University.
Area of Research:
American Revolution, the Early Republic, History and Public Policy, and
Legal/Constitutional history
Education:
University of Pennsylvania, Ph.D. (1989)
Major Publications:
Cornell is the author of A Well Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and
the Origins of Gun Control in America and The Other Founders: Anti-Federalism
and the Dissenting Tradition in America, 1788-1828
voted a Choice Outstanding Academic Book for 2001 and winner of the triennial
Society of Cincinnati prize for the best work on the Revolutionary era.
He has also
published Whose Right to Bear Arms Did the Second Amendment Protect?
Bedford Book's"Historians At Work" series.
He is the editor of Retrieving the American Past: Documents and Essays on American
History, (Pearson, 1994-2005), and the forthcoming
Guns in American Law and Society: An Interdisciplinary Reader
(University of Massachusetts Press, forthcoming, 2007)
He has written articles in the Journal of American History,
American Studies, William and Mary Quarterly, William and Mary Law Review,Constitutional Commentary,
and others. His book reviews have appeared in the Journal of the
Early Republic, Reviews in American History, and many others.
Prof.
Cornell is currently writing a section of a new textbook, American
Visions: A History of the American Nation, (Pearson, under contract, with Ed O'Donnell, and Jennifer Keane).
Awards:
Cornell is the recipient of numerous awards and fellowships including:
The Dean's Award for Distinguished Teaching at the University of Pennsylvania and
the Colonial Daughters of Pennsylvania Prize in Early American History.
Society of the Cincinnati, History Book Prize, Triennial Award for the Best Book on
the American Revolutionary Era, (2001); Choice Outstanding Academic Book, (2000) all for
The Other Founders: Anti-Federalism and the Dissenting Tradition in America, 1788-1828.
Joyce Foundation, Second Amendment Center Grant (2003-2006);
Department of Education, Teaching American History Grant, Historyworks
(2002-2005);
Joyce Foundation Planning Grant, (2001-2002) ;
Betha Grant, Batelle Memorial Endowment, Ohio Teaching Institute (1999-2000);
NEH Fellowship, (2003-2004);
Gilder-Lehrman Fellowship (2002);
American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) (2001) ;
Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation, Research Fellowship (1998);
Thomas Jefferson Chair In American Studies, Fulbright Lecturing Award (1995);
Ohio State University Seed Grant (1994);
Ohio State University Special Research Assignment (1993);
Ohio State University Grant-In-Aid (1992);
NEH Post-Doctoral Fellow, Institute of Early American History and Culture (1989-1991).
Additional Info:
Cornell is the Director of the Second Amendment Research Center, John Glenn Institute
(2002- Present).
Formerly Thomas Jefferson Chair, University of Leiden, The Netherlands (1995)
Formerly Assistant Professor, Department of History, College of William and Mary
(1989-1991).
Cornell has appeared on C-Span2's Book TV, NPR and The Newshour with Jim Lehrer
on PBS.
He is also on the Editorial Board of"American Quarterly." He has delivered invited
lectures at Oxford University, Columbia University, Duke, NYU Law School,
UCLA Law School, Stanford Law School, and Vanderbilt University Law School.
He has presented papers at meetings of the American Historical Association,
the American Society of Legal History, the American Studies Association,
the Organization of American Historians, and many others.
He has a strong interest in teaching with technology. He has written about
pedagogical tools in the AHA's Perspectives and is on the Board of Advisers
of Pearson's website,"The History Place."
Personal Anecdote
No matter what aspect of the gun issue you work on you inevitably run into people with pretty strong feelings. I think it is safe to say that if I had written a history of the 3rd Amendment, I would not get angry e-mails from people with names like “glockboy@gunnet.com” or have bloggers with names like, “geek with an uzi” denounce me as part of some insidious conspiracy. (Don’t these guys know I would never be part of any conspiracy that would have me as a member.)
One of the most interesting venues to try out the ideas in my new book, A Well Regulated Militia was provided by the NRA Institute for Legislative Action and the Students for the Second Amendment at George Mason Law School (now a wholly owned subsidiary of the NRA.) I was invited to talk at their first ever Firearms Symposium. (I am still waiting for my invitation from the Jews for the Preservation of Firearms symposium: From AKs to AK-47s.) As you might expect the demographic of the GMU event was sort of the opposite of the Berks. (Berkshire Conference of Women’s Historians). Indeed, I recall one person attacking toy stores that refused to stock toy guns. These guys, and it was mostly guys, were not only against gun control, they were against toy gun control.
I began my talk by describing my situation as akin to that of a priest at his first Bar Mitzvah. Picking up on this theme during the question and answer session one member of the audience wanted to know why Jews were against guns (he obviously had never hung out with the aforementioned Jews for the Preservation of Firearms.) I explained that I did not think religion or ethnicity explained very much about attitudes towards guns. Indeed, I speculated that in Montana, all of the Jews, all six of them, were probably very heavily armed—they would have to be I would think.
Since the publication of my book I have done a fair number of radio interviews and what is most fascinating about these is the mirror they provide on popular perceptions of history and constitutionalism. Invariably, most callers are ardently pro-gun rights. Pro-gun control people seem to have other things to do with their time and don’t do a lot of talk radio.
I hope that my new book can help both sides in the debate understand the complex history that has led to our current impasse on this issue. Needless to say I would not urge anyone to venture into this contentious arena unless you have a very good sense of humor—it has proven almost as valuable as the special Kevlar edition of my book.
Quotes
By Saul Cornell
own expense and were expected to turn out at a miute's notice to defend their community,
state, and eventually their nation. The minuteman ideal was far less individualistic
than most gun rights people assume, and far more martial in spirit than most gun control advocates
realize.Although each side in the modern debate claims to be faithful to the historic Second Amendment, a restoration of its original meaning, re-creating the world of minuteman, would be a nightmare that neither side would welcome. It would certainly involve more instrusive gun regulation, not less. Proponents of gun rights would not relish the idea of mandatory gun registration, nor would they be eager to welcome government officials into their homes to inspect privately owned weapons as they did in Revolutionary days. Gun control advocates might blanch at the notion that all Americans would be required to receive firearms training and would certainly look askance at the idea of requiring all able-bodied citizens to purchase their own military-style assault weapons. Yet if the civic right to bear arms of the Founding were reintroduced, this is exactly what citizens would be obligated to do. A restoration of the original understanding of the Second Amendment would require all these measures and much more. -- Saul Cornell in"A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America"
About Saul Cornell
Basic Facts
Teaching Position:
Associate Professor of History, Columbia University (2006-);
Assistant Professor of History (2001-6)
Area of Research:
modern intellectual history, French history, Jewish studies, religious studies,
contemporary political theory, history of human rights, history of legal theory
Education:
Ph.D., UC-Berkeley (2000), J.D., Harvard University (2001)
Major Publications:
Moyn is the author of
Ethics (Cornell, 2005); A Holocaust Controversy: The Treblinka Affair in Postwar France
(Brandeis, 2005); (as editor) Pierre Rosanvallon, Democracy Past and Future
(Columbia, 2006); numerous articles.
Moyn in finishing a book about postwar French political theory tentatively entitled
A New Theory of Politics: Claude Lefort and Company in Contemporary France (Columbia)
and starting a new project on human rights in the recent and contemporary period.
Awards:
Moyn is the recipient of numerous awards and fellowships including:
Morris D. Forkosch Prize,"Journal of the History of Ideas," for best first book of the
year in intellectual history, and Koret Foundation Jewish Studies Publication Prize,
both for first book.
National Endowment for the Humanities Summer Stipend;
Sterling-Currier Fund, Grant for Conference on French Liberalism;
Columbia University Junior Faculty Development Grant (twice);
Columbia University Institute for Scholars in Paris Fellowship;
Jacob K. Javits Fellowship, U.S. Department of Education;
Gilbert Chinard Prize, Institut Français;
Phi Beta Kappa Scholarship;
Berkeley Humanities Research Grant;
Doreen B. Townsend Center Associate Fellowship (declined);
Dorot and S.I. Newhouse Foundations Israel Fellowships;
Benjamin F. Goor Prize in Jewish Studies;
Center for German and European Studies Predissertation Fellowship;
Andrew W. Mellon Predissertation Fellowship;
Andrew W. Mellon Fellowship in the Humanistic Studies (declined).
Additional Info:
Moyn is on the editorial board of"Ethics and International Affairs."
He was the editor of the"Harvard Human Rights Journal."
Moyn was Lecturer at Harvard University and was awarded Certificates of Distinction in Teaching,
(1999-2001).
He is a member of the American Historical Association, Association for Jewish Studies,
North American Levinas Society, and Society for French Historical Studies.
Personal Anecdote
Intellectual historians read books. Of course, they learn to smile and nod when others speak longingly about the treasures of this or that archive. But by and large, I would rather browse in the library stacks or head to the bookstore. I praise those who have a fetish for their documents for their contributions to knowledge - ones that I find as breathtaking and reorienting as the next historian. But I have always told myself that there are enough texts in the library - and they are the really important ones - deserving to be read and reread, interpreted and reinterpreted; and I assumed that their analysis might suffice for a scholarly career. Almost totally, my work has relied upon of published sources that were easily available. I have only ever risked the armchair exoticism of interlibrary loan, never impelled by what Arlette Farge has called the"taste of the archive" for the source, heaped amidst irrelevancies in a remote location, whose discovery will change the interpretation of the past.
But in a history department, one confesses such a thing only amongst friends or with a hint of shame (or after tenure). And fortunately, I have sought and found recondite documents in various places once or twice after all. The first book I wrote, on the twentieth-century moral philosopher Emmanuel Levinas, included an image of the first page he published after World War II and the Holocaust; its reproduction from a blurry mimeograph, I suppose, was intended to give my reader the impression that there were sources that historians were needed to recover, ones that people outside the discipline might never bother to search after. A version of that premise, after all, explained why I paid most attention to forgotten snippets of writing or unknown features of context throughout my treatment. Still, in spite of what I thought I learned by retrieving such things from yellowing journals and moldering books, I wasn't convinced of the necessity of going further, of rooting out some truly lost source.
When I came to write a second little book on Holocaust memory, what started out as a tiny concession to the expectations of the discipline expanded a great deal. After I resolved to approach the subject by examining how people live through controversies about the past, I fixed on the furor set off by the publication of Jean-Francois Steiner's Treblinka in 1966. Having made it a principle of my method analyze every response I could find, not just the statements of intellectual notables, I found myself disinterring minor newspapers –Yiddish dailies, for instance – and even grubbing in the archives. I realized, in fact, that in this case those hidden sources mattered to me most of all. One essential part of my story became how, at this moment in time, those with most actual experiential authority to speak were marginal to public debate while those with least were central -- simply because they happened to be famous for other reasons or were otherwise well-placed to communicate with the public. Most surprisingly, at Yad Vashem in Israel, I stumbled across a long and moving letter that a survivor of the camp in question had drafted when he read the book that purported to be an account of a place he had lived and suffered. He had never sent the letter to the book's author, however, and so my accidental discovery of its existence in effect allowed me to reconnect with this since disappeared survivor and, finally, to let him be heard. That was the moment when I felt most kinship with other historians and understood why they live the professional lives they do.
It might seem that the experience would have converted me. But it didn't. The distaste of the archive persists. Not that I rule out going back if the topics demands it. But in fact, I find that I no longer approach the most elite and textual kind of intellectual history with as fraught a conscience. I confess more unrepentantly that I would still rather read a work of philosophical difficulty or cultural commentary, for my own benefit or as historical evidence. Yet now I know that a historian can be driven, even against initial inclination, to be the kind of student of the past he did not intend at first. For me, this has been one of the most enlightening lessons of the practice of history, and one I hope I am forced to re-learn again and again.
Quotes
By Samuel Moyn
Amos Funkenstein once observed, in an aphorism certainly applicable to [Emmanuel]
Levinas and the origins of the other, 'not in the invention of new categories or
new figures of thought, but rather in a surprising employment of existing ones.'
The origins of the other occurred, to put the argument of this book in a formula,
through the transplantation of theology into phenomenology....The revival of interest in religion and ethnicity in the last decades has, in a paradox not yet understood, occurred at the same time of increasing skepticism towards the meaningful integrity and aboriginal coherence of cultural identities of all kinds. This book sides decisively with the skeptical view in presenting the Jewish inheritance Levinas received as too eroded, fragmentary and contested to provide a coherent identity for the philosopher to adopt, and credits him with far more liberty of selection, motivation of interpretation, and creativity of mind in crafting the identity he is often understood to have straightforwardly inhabited. Put more bluntly, in Levinas's case, as more generally, the rhetoric of finding has to be replaced with the rhetoric of making." Samuel Moyn in"Origins of the Other"
About Samuel Moyn
"Samuel Moyn is an amazing professor, a great guy who is extremely friendly and very knowledgeable and willing to work with his students."...
"You would be hard pressed to find a better prepared or more engaging teacher at Columbia...Prof Moyn is an excellent teacher--available to students, smart, fair, funny, organized."..."Moyn is a great lecturer, he's entertaining and exceptionally brilliant." -- Anonymous Students
