Interview: Clinton Historian Seeks To Dispel "Cartoon Images"Historians in the News
Before embarking on this 17-year-long project, Branch, the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of Martin Luther King Jr.'s three-volume biography, had denounced politics after growing disenchanted as a campaign volunteer during the 1972 McGovern campaign -- for which he, incidentally, worked closely with Clinton in Texas. But weeks after Clinton won the presidency in November 1992, the then president-elect summoned Branch to a clandestine dinner at Katherine Graham's house and asked him to be the official historian of the eight years that were yet to come. I met Branch last Monday night at Politics and Prose, where we talked about his no-holds-barred approach to the relatively controversial project -- Clinton kept these cassettes in the back of his sock drawers for fear of his own aides finding out and leaking them to the media. A slightly edited transcript of our conversation follows:
Tali Yahalom: Why did you decide to take on this project? What were your goals and do you think you achieved them?
Taylor Branch: Well you never think you've accomplished a goal, if you're a writer, until everybody on Earth has read your book. I wanted to get a preview of what an unfiltered access to a president being president is like, trying to preserve memories. This is second best, third best, fourth best to actually recording his phone conversations and in meetings. This was his idea -- the project was his idea, it wasn't mine. I'm not making any judgments about Clinton -- it's too soon and I'm too, I'm not impartial. But I do think that it's primary record. And the second goal is that I try to take people inside the White House, to give them some sense of what it's like to be around a sitting president in the white house, which it gives a little relief to the book, but also some primary experience, because I think that we have an unrealistic and an overly ideological cartoon-images of presidents.
TY: How did President Clinton convince you to do this?
TB: He was concerned about the preservation of [historical] material. I was stunned that he was thinking about that before he took office, because I had kind of written him off as a cookie-cutter politician, I was a little cynical about politics, I had even told him that I wasn't going to be involved in any more political campaigns after 1972 because I was disillusioned with politics. There was a little negotiation, because he wanted me to move into the White House and be his in-house historian. I told him that I didn't think that would work, that it wouldn't be taken seriously. We talked about various other alternatives, what he could do, I recommended that he keep a diary all by himself and he said that he couldn't do it.
TY: Why not?
TB: He said that he had a fabulous memory, but that the problem was when he sat down at the end of the day, there were too many topics to talk about. He didn't have any sort of sense of where to start, he could talk all day about any one of 100 things.
TY: How did you manage to keep this project a secret?
TB: I couldn't talk about it, I couldn't tell my friends I was doing it, I couldn't tell most of my relatives. I had a lame, in my view, defensible cover story that we had reignited, that we had gotten reacquainted in occasional conversations about history, and that's what I would say.
TY: People believed that?
TB: Yes, we had been roommates before, and they didn't know how often I was going there, and they certainly didn't know I was going in late at night and doing recordings. A couple of people on his staff occasionally did see me before I could hide my recorders. I know Leon Panetta did, the chief of staff did, but they didn't say 'What are you doing here, what's the nature of that?' I don't really know what went through their mind.
TY: What will this book do for Clinton's legacy and his role in public memory?
TB: Some people think that it reinforces what they already think of him -- that he was all over the place and that he was angry. Or that he felt persecuted by the press. Other people think, my own view is, that, relative to my own image of him, let alone the cynicisms that I felt about him as someone who didn't believe in anything and who was rudderless and a creator of Dick Morris and all that, I didn't see any of that and, in that sense, I felt that I was on another planet from the kind of prevailing consensus. ... There's now a myth that politics is useless and that Clinton, in particular, was Bubba from Arkansas -- there's a lot of condescension there, and I don't think that will live. I think that some of that will be adjusted...
comments powered by Disqus
- When Jim Crow Reigned Amid the Rubble of Nazi Germany
- Why Suburban American Homeowners Were Accused of Being a 'Profit-Making Cartel' in the 1970s
- Animals large and small once covered North America’s prairies – and in some places, they could again
- Library of Congress acquires major archive of African American photographer Shawn Walker
- A farm boy became a fearsome warrior at Iwo Jima. And he did it with a flamethrower.
- Trump and the Christians: Evangelical historian John Fea on decoding the great paradox
- Six historians weigh in on the biggest misconceptions about black history
- Renowned presidential historian Doris Kearns Goodwin finally takes on George Washington
- Legal Historian Jed Shugerman Says William Barr's Actions Are "Remarkably Not Normal"
- Historian Ruth Ben-Ghiat Quoted in Washington Post Article on Trump's Quest to Rewrite History