;



Frederick Kagan & Kimberly Kagan: How Prime Minister Maliki Pacified Iraq

Roundup: Historians' Take




[Ms. Kagan is president of the Institute for the Study of War in Washington, D.C., and author of "The Surge: A Military History," forthcoming from Encounter Books. Mr. Kagan is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.]

America is very close to succeeding in Iraq. The "near-strategic defeat" of al Qaeda in Iraq described by CIA Director Michael Hayden last month in the Washington Post has been followed by the victory of the Iraqi government's security forces over illegal Shiite militias, including Iranian-backed Special Groups. The enemies of Iraq and America now cling desperately to their last bastions, while the political process builds momentum.

These tremendous gains remain fragile and could be lost to skillful enemy action, or errors in Baghdad or Washington. But where the U.S. was unequivocally losing in Iraq at the end of 2006, we are just as unequivocally winning today.

By February 2008, America and its partners accomplished a series of tasks thought to be impossible. The Sunni Arab insurgency and al Qaeda in Iraq were defeated in Anbar, Diyala and Baghdad provinces, and the remaining leaders and fighters clung to their last urban outpost in Mosul. The Iraqi government passed all but one of the "benchmark" laws (the hydrocarbon law being the exception, but its purpose is now largely accomplished through the budget) and was integrating grass-roots reconciliation with central political progress. The sectarian civil war had ended.

Meanwhile, the Iraqi Security Forces (ISF), swelled by 100,000 new recruits in 2007, was fighting hard and skillfully throughout Iraq. The Shiite-led government was showing an increasing willingness to use its forces even against Shiite militias. The announcement that provincial elections would be held by year's end galvanized political movements across the country, focusing Iraq's leaders on the need to get more votes rather than more guns.

Three main challenges to security and political progress remained: clearing al Qaeda out of Mosul; bringing Basra under the Iraqi government's control; and eliminating the Special Groups safe havens in Sadr City. It seemed then that these tasks would require enormous effort, entail great loss of life, and take the rest of the year or more. Instead, the Iraqi government accomplished them within a few months.....

Read entire article at WSJ

comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


james joseph butler - 6/14/2008

Sing hallelujah come on get happy,
put on a happy face! These people are like John McCain and Vietnam, they learn nothing from history because the history doesn't match their version of Honor, Truth and Democracy.
The U.S. is bribing and empowering warlords and sectarian elements. We've had four years of successful ethnic cleansing so naturally the sectarian warfare has diminished.
None of these factions has any loyalty to America. The Wash. Post today stated that the leading Shiite parties are vying for the most anti-American platform in order to win the next election. Does anyone really think the Sunnis wouldn't look the other way at best if somebody rolled out a rocket with, "Tel Aviv here we come" painted on it?
Fred and Kimberly are like so many other neo-cons who continue to get exposure on op-ed pgs. and Cabinet meetings; they don't get it. They have learned nothing from the last five years.