David Starkey's Advice to Teachers: Skip the Academic Theories and Teach Facts and ContextRoundup: Talking About History
Richard Garner, in the Independent (June 28, 2004):
THE CULT of the celebrity historian is destructive to the way the subject is approached in schools, the historian and broadcaster Dr David Starkey told a teachers' conference yesterday.
There was too much concentration on "new" theories of history, rather than a basic knowledge and understanding of the past, Dr Starkey said. Historical knowledge was more important "because D Starkey will go out of fashion as G R Elton a noted academic who focused on the Tudors will also go out of fashion".
Dr Starkey, who was speaking to a gathering of history teachers attending a weekend summer school organised by the Prince of Wales in Buxton, Derbyshire, said that the current GCSE syllabus was "content indifferent". He added: "This seems to me to be absolutely catastrophic."
Examiners had thrown out factual content and perceived study of defined dates in history as "mindless". While Dr Starkey acknowledged that there could be criticism of too-rigid a concentration on dates, he said: "What happened was we threw out the baby with the bath water."
He singled out one question set in an AS-level exam this summer as "insane". Pupils were asked to devote about 17 minutes to "discuss the role of Archbishop Cranmer in the formation of religious policy between 1534 and 1540". Dr Starkey said: "I'd love to have seen the examiner's notes as to what was the right answer to the question, because there are only two people in the country who can answer that question, and one of them is standing here."
He said the move towards a skills rather than knowledge-based approach to history had tended to produce barrack-room lawyer history. "One of the reasons we have lost the debate is we stopped teaching the history of our nation and of our own culture properly," he said. "I'm not calling for our island story' and tub-thumping accounts of the British Empire, but we need to have a sense of history's importance and also that it can be fun."
He told the teachers: "You are not inventing the past. You're the vehicle that communicates it. It is not your job to reflect the latest little bit of academic fashion."
Teachers should communicate to their pupils a broad depth of understanding of the past by focusing not just on its politics but also its style of dress, the houses people lived in and its landscape.
"That's what you should be communicating," he said. "That's why people watch history on TV. It is that entry into a vast world. Academic gains are only a tiny, tiny bit of that."
Dr Starkey, who is the writer and presenter of a number of popular television historical series, including Elizabeth I and the Six Wives of Henry VIII, was one of three distinguished television historians invited to address the summer school. The others were professors Simon Schama and Niall Ferguson, who said that there was too much concentration on "Hitler and the Henrys" (the Tudor kings) in history exams, with the result that university applicants failed to have a broad grasp of history.
The weekend school was the third organised by the Prince of Wales. Eighty teachers
of English and history were invited to spend the weekend with academics and
writers discussing their subjects.
comments powered by Disqus
Brandon Allan Nord - 11/12/2010
Really? What is the real goal when you're trying to get kids to memorize a slough of names, dates, and places? Is the goal of a history class to simply instill respect for one's country? I don't think reverting to the tribalism that has caused incredible amounts of death, despair, and destruction in centuries past should be the goal of any history class, anywhere. I don't know exactly what "fads" you're referring to. Perhaps you take issue with a thematic approach or even one that initiates understanding multiple perspectives on various events? If correct, then I'd have to question your motive as a history teacher. These both help students to recognize that lessons of the past should provide us an insight into creating a more just world. Not to sound too conspiratorial-minded, but it is the boneheaded "here is a list of American presidents whose names and dates in office should be memorized for this Friday's quiz" approach to history that keeps our population politically numb and incapable of making better decisions by learning from lessons of the past. They're so tuned out, because of the boring, hero-centered mythology that they've been made to swallow, that they don't even pay attention to politics. And if that's then goal, then I have to ask, who do you work for? What are you trying to promote? Honestly, I can't even believe this piece is real. I feel like I'm reading a document from the Soviet Union circa 1980.
- Top Ten differences between the Iraq War and Trump’s Proposed Iran War
- Woodrow Wilson Foundation Releases Findings on Why Americans Don't Know History
- How will Obama be remembered? A massive new oral history project will help shape his legacy.
- 30 Years Later, Making Sense Of The MOVE Bombing
- They Resisted Hitler. They Were Executed. At Last, They Lie at Rest.
- Historians Argue That The History Major Won’t Go the Way of the Dodo
- Tenure, Twitter and Taking Her Board to Task
- The new Statue of Liberty Museum is a quiet paean to America’s embrace of immigrants—but what is there to celebrate?
- McCullough’s new book on pioneers’ history draws criticism
- What to Do With Richmond’s Confederate Statues