originalism 
-
-
SOURCE: Slate
6/20/2023
Clarence Thomas Took a Swipe at My Dissertation Research in a Decision. Here's Why He's Wrong
by Gregory Ablavsky
Historians' work played a huge role in a recent decision affecting Native American children. But the dissent by Clarence Thomas showed an appalling willingness to cherry-pick from the past that undermines originalism's own claims to legitimacy.
-
-
SOURCE: New York Times
3/14/2023
SCOTUS Decision Means Today's Gun Cases Require Experts on 1790s Weaponry
Legal historians Saul Cornell, Jennifer Tucker and others are in high demand as a legal consultant after the Bruen decision elevated the historical meaning of gun laws to importance in the judicial process.
-
-
SOURCE: Slate
2/15/2023
We Don't Need to Pretend Clarence Thomas Can Read the Founders' Minds
by Heidi Li Feldman and Dahlia Lithwick
The approach to "original intent" laid out in recent gun control rulings imagines the founders as capable only of the most cramped and limited understanding of the function of law in a society, argue a legal scholar and veteran court reporter.
-
-
SOURCE: The Atlantic
2/9/2023
Originalism Will Kill Women
by Madiba K. Dennie
"Originalist ideology glorifies an era of blatant oppression along racial, gender, and class lines, transforming that era’s lowest shortcomings into our highest standards."
-
-
10/23/2022
Originalism is Doomed to Failure. Will it Destroy Democracy First?
by Richard Striner
Textualism as a theory of judicial interpretation arose as a semantic game among academics, but has been put to brutal use by the Federalist Society to undermine the democracy that most 21st century Americans enjoy.
-
-
SOURCE: Made By History at the Washington Post
10/10/2022
Does Justice Jackson Offer a Path to Defend Rights Through Originalism?
by Evan Turiano
Abolitionists and the drafters of the Reconstruction Amendments understood that the legitimacy of broader claims to rights and citizenship depended on making a claim on the purposes set forth for the Constitution. Ketanji Brown Jackson's recent voting rights dissent suggests she hopes to revive that tradition.
-
-
10/9/2022
Lincoln Would have Had an Answer for the "Originalists"
by Richard Striner
The 16th President looked to the constitutional crises of his time and asked whether the document was created to serve the people or the other way around. Today he might ask the same of the Supreme Court.
-
-
SOURCE: Mother Jones
10/4/2022
Justice Jackson's Questioning in Voting Rights Case Shows History Won't be Left to Court's Right Wing
The new Associate Justice pushed back against the idea that the writers of the 14th Amendment intended for it to ensure "color-blind" treatment of voters rather than an affirmative defense of racially inclusive political participation.
-
-
SOURCE: Above the Law
10/3/2022
Judge Laurence Silberman Dies—Do His Latter Years Make the Case for Judicial Reform?
A legal observer suggests the influential judge's reputation might have benefitted from judicial term limits, as his penchant for judicial restraint took a hard turn toward activism in decisions on gun control and public pronouncements about confederate monuments.
-
-
SOURCE: Michael Smith's Law Blog
8/10/2022
Choosing History—A Rejoinder to William Baude on The Use of History at SCOTUS
by Michael Smith
The problem with the historical arguments in this term's SCOTUS decisions is that the court isn't "using" history but "choosing" it—deciding whether or not historical examples map onto present beliefs about the legitimacy of rights or regulations.
-
-
SOURCE: Washington Post
8/8/2022
Law Prof: If Recent SCOTUS Decisions Relied on Bad History, Opponents Need to Come Up with a Better Version
William Baude of the University of Chicago argues that if historical arguments have been used selectively in recent cases, it opens the door for dissenting justices to propose more compelling narratives about the constitutional basis of rights.
-
-
7/31/2022
Weaponizing Bad-Faith History is a Conservative Tradition from Jim Crow to Alito
by Charles J. Holden
"Conservatives’ invocations of history often mixed wishful thinking about the past with bad faith in interpreting it. And it was always done with the present-minded purpose of maintaining elite white male rule, especially on matters of race."
-
-
SOURCE: Made By History at the Washington Post
7/22/2022
What Conservative Justices Get Wrong About the Founders
by Timothy C. Leech
It's preposterous to argue that the Founders, men of the Enlightenment generation, would have intended for the constitution they drafted to be immutable and unchanging.
-
-
SOURCE: The Atlantic
7/20/2022
Originalism is Just Selective History
by David H. Gans
"This is a Court that insists it is following history and tradition where they lead, while cherry-picking the history it cares about to reach conservative results."
-
-
SOURCE: Politico
6/26/2022
On the Historical Dilettantes Practicing Originalism
by Joshua Zeitz
"The functional problem with originalism is that it requires a very, very firm grasp of history — a grasp that none of the nine justices, and certainly few of their 20-something law clerks, freshly minted from J.D. programs, possess."
-
-
SOURCE: Slate
6/24/2022
Thomas's Guns Opinion is Ahistorical and Anti-Originalist
by Saul Cornell
"Ultimately, the majority opinion in NYSRPA v. Bruen is one of the most intellectually dishonest and poorly argued decisions in American judicial history."
-
-
SOURCE: The New Yorker
6/23/2022
Adam Winkler on Thomas's Historical Cherry-Picking on Gun Rights
Isaac Chotiner interviews law professor and legal historian Adam Winkler on the selective use of history in the New York state gun rights decision.
-
-
6/5/2022
What Would Madison Think of Originalism? Depends When You Asked Him
by Don Fraser
James Madison moved away from a strict constructionist position based on public necessity and acceptance of legislation based in implied powers. Whatever one can say about the originalist legal theory behind the leaked Dobbs opinion, it's not Madisonian.
-
-
5/29/2022
Originalism, History, and Religiosity are the Faults of Alito's Reasoning in Dobbs
by Robert Spitzer
Justice Alito wrote in Dobbs that Roe v. Wade was “egregiously wrong from the start.” But that tart conclusion more aptly applies to the draft verdict of the good justice.
-
-
SOURCE: Made By History at the Washington Post
11/3/2021
If the Justices Really Value "Originalism," They Can Only Vote One Way in Guns Case
by Saul Cornell
"If the justices professing to believe in originalism are sincere about their method, this case offers the rare opportunity to prove that originalism is not always a prescription for results-oriented judging that follows a conservative political agenda."