‘Nineteen Nineteen’ Review: A Year Seen Through the Lens of Its ArtifactsHistorians in the News
tags: historians, Museum, 1919
That was the year that railroad and real-estate magnate Henry E. Huntington and his wife, Arabella, signed the trust agreement creating the Huntington as a public institution. A centennial exhibition was clearly in order. But curators James Glisson and Jennifer A. Watts chose to avoid the obvious—chronicling the institution’s history. They decided instead to show what the world was like during that “cataclysmic” year, full of revolution, recovery, redrawn national borders and struggles for human rights.
This fresh approach celebrates the wealth of the Huntington’s collections but also exposes their idiosyncratic nature, which was determined by the interests of its founders and subsequent directors and donors. Even drawing from its 11 million objects and using the broadest parameters—selecting items that were made, published, exhibited, edited or acquired in 1919—the curators could not create a full portrait of a year that included the ratification of Prohibition, the Russian civil war, the Amritsar Massacre, the Black Sox Scandal and the race riots and lynchings of the “Red Summer,” to name a few events that had to be omitted (except in the blown-up newspaper clips that provide a backdrop to the display).
comments powered by Disqus
- The 100-Year Old Miscalculation that Drained the Colorado River
- How Richard Nixon Alienated Allies after Watergate (and Lessons for Trump)
- What Explains Fascism's Durable Roots in Italy?
- Los Angeles Project Aims to Name Every Interned Japanese American
- Documentary on the Last Slave Ship to Arrive in the United States Takes on Questions of Memorializing Racist Violence
- COVID Shows the US as a Country Kept from Grieving
- Education or Trauma: Debating the Movie Presentation of "Till"
- Sergey Radchenko on Putin's Mobilization Speech
- A Finnish Historian's Ambitious Rethinking of Native American History Draws Praise and Criticism
- National Archives Exhibition Challenges the Meritocratic, Democratic Myths of American Sports