Dynasties: An American Tradition
Dynasties start with an impulse to power that transcends the life of one man. In the case of the Adamses, the Gores, and the Kennedys, they began with the will of one founding father, who pointed his children at one place—the presidency—and began rigorous training in childhood. The Roosevelt drama began in reverse—a son-driven dynasty—with the wish of two younger Roosevelts, Franklin and Ted Jr., to seize and latch on to the mantle of Theodore, the hero and father-figure to both. Between these two poles, we encounter the Bushes, a dynasty, not quite so dynastic, a low-key dynasty, an “accidental dynasty,” a reluctant dynasty, a dynasty that denies that it is one. Most dynasties are top-down, and begin with a bang: the decision of a Gore or a Kennedy male to create a succession. The Bushes are bottom-up, and built up by increments: Prescott Bush was a New Englander and a gentleman-banker who dabbled in politics as almost an after-thought; George H.W. Bush was a transitional figure who moved from New England to Texas and seemed more of a diplomat even while president; Jeb and George W. are pure politicians, and products of the south and the west.
Dynastic sons have been president during the two scariest moments of the current half-century: on September 11, 2001, when Islamist terrorists struck New York and Washington, and in October, 1962, when atomic missiles capable of striking New York and Washington were discovered in Cuba. Dynastic sons—no fewer than three of them—helped steer the country to the edge of a constitutional breakdown after the 2000 election was tied. Dynastic dynamics had combined with partisan interests to create a near-shipwreck. Would it have been fought with such murderous passion if the three men concerned in it did not have so much to prove to their kin?