Nadia Abu El-Haj: Colleague disputes her claims
Last night, Barnard religion professor Alan Segal lectured on the lack of academic accuracy in the work of assistant professor Nadia Abu El-Haj, whose tenure process has sparked controversy due to her book in which she denies the existence of the ancient Jewish state of Israel.
In his lecture, titled “What Biblical Archaeology Tells Us About the First Temple Period,” Segal focused on the role of archaeology in proving certain aspects of the Bible to be true, including the existence of a Jewish state in Israel in ancient times.
“The problem is that everyone wants someone like her for the diversity of the college, and I agree, she looks great on paper. But then you read the book and you say, ‘No, this isn’t the right person,’” said Segal, who stated he does not believe that Abu El-Haj, a Fulbright Scholar and Palestinian-American, should be granted tenure.
During his speech, Segal cited several ancient artifacts, including a ninth-century-BCE stone tablet called the Mesha Stele which refers to the “Kingdom of Israel” in Hebrew text, as proof that Abu El-Haj has made false claims. “The point is we do have a lot of evidence that there were people called Israel living in the land,” Segal said. He also discussed how professor Abu El-Haj’s lack of knowledge of ancient Hebrew causes her to “make mistakes that affect her conclusions.”
Dozens of Barnard alumnae have signed an online anti-tenure petition accusing Abu El-Haj of shoddy scholarship in her book, Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society. The work is an extension of her doctoral dissertation, which was accepted at Duke University....
Segal’s lecture was the first in a series hosted jointly by LionPAC, the nonpartisan pro-Israel activist group at Columbia, and the academic organization Scholars for Peace in the Middle East....
Read entire article at Columbia Spectator
In his lecture, titled “What Biblical Archaeology Tells Us About the First Temple Period,” Segal focused on the role of archaeology in proving certain aspects of the Bible to be true, including the existence of a Jewish state in Israel in ancient times.
“The problem is that everyone wants someone like her for the diversity of the college, and I agree, she looks great on paper. But then you read the book and you say, ‘No, this isn’t the right person,’” said Segal, who stated he does not believe that Abu El-Haj, a Fulbright Scholar and Palestinian-American, should be granted tenure.
During his speech, Segal cited several ancient artifacts, including a ninth-century-BCE stone tablet called the Mesha Stele which refers to the “Kingdom of Israel” in Hebrew text, as proof that Abu El-Haj has made false claims. “The point is we do have a lot of evidence that there were people called Israel living in the land,” Segal said. He also discussed how professor Abu El-Haj’s lack of knowledge of ancient Hebrew causes her to “make mistakes that affect her conclusions.”
Dozens of Barnard alumnae have signed an online anti-tenure petition accusing Abu El-Haj of shoddy scholarship in her book, Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society. The work is an extension of her doctoral dissertation, which was accepted at Duke University....
Segal’s lecture was the first in a series hosted jointly by LionPAC, the nonpartisan pro-Israel activist group at Columbia, and the academic organization Scholars for Peace in the Middle East....
Related Links
Alan F. Segal: Some Professional Observations on the Controversy about Nadia Abu El-Haj’s First Book Aren Maeir: Freedom of Speech or Freedom of Slander?