With support from the University of Richmond

History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.

Malcolm A. Kline: Cold War Amnesia

The Cold War between the United States and the former Soviet Union is still being fought, not by unrepentant, unreconstructed anti-communists but by campus leftists born too late to be communist collaborators."In last month's undergraduate elections, a cadre of demagogues, in a disgusting publicity stunt, projected the image of a hammer and sickle onto one of Stanford's most venerable landmarks: Hoover Tower," Jason Dunkel, the business manager of the Stanford Review writes in a June 2008 fundraising letter."Their platform called for the detainment of such 'criminals' as Donald Rumsfeld and Condoleezza Rice as well as the banning of 'unfriendly corporations [from] campus unless they withdrawal [sic] their lobbyists' from Washington."

"They entitled their slate 'Revolution!'" Unlike the Japanese on Iwo Jima who did not know that World War II had ended because they were hiding in caves on the island, these young firebrands cannot claim to have been in cavernous hideouts that made transmission of news difficult.

Nevertheless, the Palo Alto campus, like most college campuses, is one in which contact with The Real World is limited to turning on that MTV staple. The level of ignorance among students about the struggle that took up nearly half of the last century is astounding.

"Ask college students, and I have, how many Stalin killed and you get the answer, 'thousands,'" Alan Charles Kors of the University of Pennsylvania said of the victims of communism at a seminar dedicated to their memory at the Heritage Foundation last summer. Ironically, a fairly conservative young man with a Master's degree said to me, in reacting to the notice of that very meeting,"Wouldn't it have been great to be the head communist?"

After my article on the event appeared, in which I laid out the facts on the mass genocide as given by the speakers, that same youthful scholar asked,"But how many people did Stalin kill personally?" The problem stems from academia and journalism, from which both undergraduate and graduate students get their information.

Even students trying to be well-informed are relying on academics and journalists to inform them. Against this backdrop, these elites should be venerating those who got it right rather than ignoring or dismissing them outright.

Robert Conquest spent decades estimating a casualty rate amassed from the testimony of defectors. Most academics denigrated his work, relying on Soviet government statistics instead.

Few of them volunteered to carry Conquest on their shoulders when his numbers proved closer to the actual count than theirs. For this reason, he wanted to retitle the reissue of one of his books,"I told you so, you f----g fools," according to In Denial by John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr. Veteran journalist M. Stanton Evans would be forgiven for adopting a similar attitude towards his detractors....

Read entire article at Accuracy in Academia