L. Brent Bozell: Oliver Stone, Lousy Historian
Dear Oliver,
Many years ago, when Bill Maher’s comedy show was hosted by Comedy Central and he was funny, his formula for success was truly unique. Every week two sets of political and/or cultural opposites were pitted against each other, and he refereed with humor. It was all designed for a good laugh and succeeded because once upon a time Bill Maher was truly funny.
Some producer really thought in extremes when they pitted Oliver Stone and Brent Bozell for one episode. I have to say that you were gracious, charming, engaging, and we enjoyed ourselves – except for that moment when I chastised you for claiming you’re an historian. You bristled and denied ever claming that moniker. I cited the source, an interview in some West Coast paper (I can’t recall which one now). "I’m a filmmaker, that’s all," you told me.
Problem is, Oliver, you’re an historian whether you believe it or not. You make films about history and historical figures. You record history, and that makes you an historian.
Being an historian is not the problem. It’s that you’re a lousy historian.
Your last project was the movie W. I confess I didn’t watch it: I knew it would be a predictable left-wing spin about Bush being dumb and evil, and it could be worse because it could have been Cheney. Yawn. It bombed.
You were back on Maher’s show the other day talking about historical figures. Maher wanted to know why you haven’t done a film about Ronald Reagan, since "that is the type of character you could do very well with." God only knows what he meant by that, but when you gave your answer, you were pretty blunt.
"Nixon always said Reagan was a dumb son of a bitch," you said, and the audience laughed, and you smiled and decided to take that statement further by agreeing with it. So you said, "You know, I think that he was," and the audience now cheered and hooted and applauded.
See what I mean when I say you’re a lousy historian? Don’t take my word for it, Oliver.
I turned to Frank Donatelli, the White House Political Director under President Reagan from 1987 through 1989. I asked him what he thought of your observation. Here’s what he has to say:
"Bill Maher and Oliver Stone have both made careers of ad hominem attacks on their political opponents. As Reagan would say, 'It's not that they're ignorant. It's just that they know so much that isn't so.' The literature as written by conservative and liberal observers is overwhelming in concluding that Ronald Reagan was fully engaged in implementing policies during his presidency that resulted in the longest economic expansion in our history and the end of the Cold War and the defeat of Communism. His presidential reputation is growing and history will remember Reagan as one of the great presidents in our nation's history."...
Read entire article at Media Research Center
Many years ago, when Bill Maher’s comedy show was hosted by Comedy Central and he was funny, his formula for success was truly unique. Every week two sets of political and/or cultural opposites were pitted against each other, and he refereed with humor. It was all designed for a good laugh and succeeded because once upon a time Bill Maher was truly funny.
Some producer really thought in extremes when they pitted Oliver Stone and Brent Bozell for one episode. I have to say that you were gracious, charming, engaging, and we enjoyed ourselves – except for that moment when I chastised you for claiming you’re an historian. You bristled and denied ever claming that moniker. I cited the source, an interview in some West Coast paper (I can’t recall which one now). "I’m a filmmaker, that’s all," you told me.
Problem is, Oliver, you’re an historian whether you believe it or not. You make films about history and historical figures. You record history, and that makes you an historian.
Being an historian is not the problem. It’s that you’re a lousy historian.
Your last project was the movie W. I confess I didn’t watch it: I knew it would be a predictable left-wing spin about Bush being dumb and evil, and it could be worse because it could have been Cheney. Yawn. It bombed.
You were back on Maher’s show the other day talking about historical figures. Maher wanted to know why you haven’t done a film about Ronald Reagan, since "that is the type of character you could do very well with." God only knows what he meant by that, but when you gave your answer, you were pretty blunt.
"Nixon always said Reagan was a dumb son of a bitch," you said, and the audience laughed, and you smiled and decided to take that statement further by agreeing with it. So you said, "You know, I think that he was," and the audience now cheered and hooted and applauded.
See what I mean when I say you’re a lousy historian? Don’t take my word for it, Oliver.
I turned to Frank Donatelli, the White House Political Director under President Reagan from 1987 through 1989. I asked him what he thought of your observation. Here’s what he has to say:
"Bill Maher and Oliver Stone have both made careers of ad hominem attacks on their political opponents. As Reagan would say, 'It's not that they're ignorant. It's just that they know so much that isn't so.' The literature as written by conservative and liberal observers is overwhelming in concluding that Ronald Reagan was fully engaged in implementing policies during his presidency that resulted in the longest economic expansion in our history and the end of the Cold War and the defeat of Communism. His presidential reputation is growing and history will remember Reagan as one of the great presidents in our nation's history."...