Blogs > Cliopatria > Paths Not Chosen

Jun 27, 2005

Paths Not Chosen




For some reason, at first reading, this story of terrorism in Israel gave me pangs of anguish more than many among the unrelenting deluge of atrocities we have all read about in the last five years. (Thanks to Judith Apter Klinghoffer for the heads up.) Here we have a young Palestinian woman who has suffered from an egregious household accident in which she suffered extensive burns. It seems at least in part as a result of that, she becomes the ideal woman terrorist, even though it is clear that she has gotten a great deal in terms of medical care and the like from the state of Israel. And yet she crosses the border in hopes of committing an atrocity in which she would kill as many Jews as possible. “Today I wanted to blow myself up in a hospital,” she testified to a gathered assemblage of the media, “maybe even in the one in which I was treated. But since lots of Arabs come to be treated there, I decided I would go to another, maybe the Tel Hashomer, near Tel Aviv. I wanted to kill 20, 50 Jews …'' When asked if she wanted to kill babies and children, she answered in the affirmative.

Maybe it is that the story is well written and thus poignant. Maybe it is that I fear that the more potential there is for women to become suicide bombers will inevitably bring about more children deciding capriciously to kill themselves for a cause they cannot possibly understand. Or perhaps it is simply that I am tired of it. I am tired for the Israeli people who deal with these attacks on a constant basis. I am weary for Palestinians who do not realize that there will be no path for them that crosses through the rubble of destroyed Israeli lives, and that the only way they have a legitimate case to press is if they foreswear terrorism. I am exhausted from having to argue with friends and colleagues about the best way to combat those who want to kill us. I am weary for our soldiers who fight under a plan so haphazardly thrown together it looks almost willfully incompetent. I am weary of so much of this. But then I realize that maybe that is what they want. They want for us to be tired. They want for us to decide that it is not worth it. They want for us to have that moment of doubt. And we cannot. Tired feet must march onward.

One of the ironies attendant in the resolution of this grim snapshot of Israel’s daily confrontation is that once that woman was discovered to have been strapped with explosives, she was lucky to have been stopped by soldiers from the country she so viscerally hates as to want to kill its citizens in its hospitals. Had she been discovered in Syria or Iran or Yemen or any other of dozens of countries in the world, she would have been shot. If she was lucky. Perhaps she would have been stoned to death after being gang-raped. The fate of her family would have been just as bad, perhaps worse. And we would know nothing of it. There would have been no free press to cover it. There would be no court proceedings to follow. The soldiers would not have had clear rules of engagement that meant that even after the woman tried to set off deadly explosives intended to kill them they still were to try to subdue her if at all possible and only use deadly force if it became absolutely necessary.

All of this is ironic because were the Palestinians to have given up violence, the intifada, the uprisings, they would be closer to a state for their own people. Had Palestinians finally understood that Israel is not going to succumb to obliteration, and that while the Palestinians are not going to get everything they ask for they can get so much more than they have now, they would have much of that for which they fight. And had they been able to develop a non-violent struggle against those civil rights and human rights violations that do occur in their troubled land they would have garnered the sympathy of people like me, for whom the talk of rights is almost innately hardwired into our system. People like me could have said “Israel, our ally, is a good state. It must be a better state. Israel is a country based on justice and democracy and liberalism. It must be more just, more democratic, more liberal.” And perhaps we could have said similar things about a Palestinian state that would be inevitably flawed, but also hopeful and, yes, democratic and liberal, just and good. But we do not have these options. A country that sees its citizens die in clubs and restaurants and cafes and buses and hospitals cannot hear cries for civil rights in the midst of such uncivil wrongs. And those of us who support Israel cannot ask it to make concessions to murder. If only that young woman at the border crossing had realized this. If only so many hundreds, thousands, of others had realized this, things might be different now.



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


JoAnn Ryan - 6/28/2005

Actually neither extremist side seems very rational; maybe that's the reason for the word "extremist." The situation is more like two women involved in a cat fight over one man- ridiculous and inappropriate.


E. Simon - 6/28/2005

actually it was indeed "amen _corner_," not that it matters in any way other than that both individuals I've now heard supplying the term tend to make statements about the Middle East that don't generally seem to make much sense.


E. Simon - 6/28/2005

and the term "amen chorus" was incidentally used to describe supporters of Israel by the non-ideological universalist humanitarian Pat Buchanan, just a few years before claiming world war II to be a war of choice, along with many other interesting observations.


Marc "Adam Moshe" Bacharach - 6/28/2005

Chris,
The article that you sent is equally damning and sickening, and those soldiers should be punished for their crime. I do denounce all terrorism, as I am sure Derek does as well.

However, the most telling difference between the Israelis and the Palestinians is that the same article cites an Israeli Human Rights organization. The Israeli people react to crimes by the military the same way every civilized country reacts to their militaries; shame, regret, and even denial from some circles. They do not react with joy, they do not celebrate, they do not plaster the faces of killers on walls and cafes. Most importantly, they do not raise their children to want to be killers and murderers.

Recognizing the reality of the conflict is the way to end it. Thus far, the Palestinians (that is to say, the leadership) has been unwilling to come to terms with Israel’s existence and sovereignty and until that happens, there will never be peace. Israel has made its peace offer (many times) and has been turned down. It is time for the Palestinians to make their own offer, one that does not hold on to their claim of return and that at least pays lip service to Israel’s security concerns. Do this, and end the terrorism, and they will have a state tomorrow.

Finally, in my humble opinion, you cannot accuse anyone of being one-sided when you use words like “apartheid conditions” in my book. The term, like Nazis, Hitler, slavery, and so many popular descriptions of Israel is as loaded as it is inaccurate.


Derek Charles Catsam - 6/28/2005

Chris --
I am reminded of the scene in the Princess Bride (which should have gotten recognition in our quotations list a while back): You keep using that word, ideology. I do not think that word means what you think it means.
It is the cudgel you try to whack those of us who disagree with you with. Even if I acknowledge the accusation (which I do not) let's justt say so what? I think my iudeology is right. Except that the problem is, what is my identifiable ideology? Yes I support Israel, but it also seems pretty clear that I lament that Palestinians have not done what it might have taken to have been able to establish their own state, one that was not a possibility in any way shape or form when the lands they would now have as their own were part of Arab nations intent on driving the Jews to the sea.
Further, am I not fairly clear in my piece that had Palestinians taken another road they might have had a sound foundation for sa civil rights movement in Israel and their own state? It seems that I say precisely that. So again, just throwing out ideology does not work -- where do you see any p[articularly ideologically-dricven approach to my piece? define that iodeology simply -- which one ought to be able to do with any ideology. Tie me into any particular ideological movement if you can. You cannot. And so simply to toss out your j'accuse does not work.
No, I do not think that word means what you seem to think it means.

dc


chris l pettit - 6/28/2005

"Or perhaps it is simply that I am tired of it. I am tired for the Israeli people who deal with these attacks on a constant basis. I am weary for Palestinians who do not realize that there will be no path for them that crosses through the rubble of destroyed Israeli lives, and that the only way they have a legitimate case to press is if they foreswear terrorism. I am exhausted from having to argue with friends and colleagues about the best way to combat those who want to kill us. I am weary for our soldiers who fight under a plan so haphazardly thrown together it looks almost willfully incompetent. I am weary of so much of this. But then I realize that maybe that is what they want. They want for us to be tired. They want for us to decide that it is not worth it. They want for us to have that moment of doubt. And we cannot. Tired feet must march onward."

Now if you could only say it for both sides...tired of the Israelis that refuse to renounce state terrorism, tired of the apartheid conditions that give rise to hopelessness...etc, etc.

As usual...it is not that you are wrong...it is that you are ideological and one sided...thus causing more problems than you claim to solve.

Another poignant story...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1516268,00.html

When will you guys start speaking of universal rights...between you and Marc, i feel as though I am in amen corner for the Israeli government. We need to denounce all atrocities in this conflict and find a real solution. the positions you take do not do this in any manner and only ensure more disagreement and violence.

CP