Blogs > Cliopatria > The Massachusetts Game

Jul 10, 2005

The Massachusetts Game




Today's Boston Globe has a wonderful article by John Thorn. A member of the Society for American Baseball Research and the author of Total Baseball: The Ultimate Besball Encyclopedia, Thorn had a brief moment in the sun last year when he discovered that baseball, or something closely resembling it, had been played in Pittsfield in Western Massachusetts, in 1791, long before previously imagined.

Today, in response to the discovery of a mysterious artifact from a game played in Massachusetts in 1858, Thorn details the conflict between the"Massachusetts Game" and the"New York Game," the two main styles of play in the 19th century. The Massachusetts game was more physically demanding with greater risk for injury. The New York game was more effete, allowing clerks and the like to live up to Victorian ideals of masculinity while not requiring one to be an especially good sportsman.

The New York game ultimately won out, and gradually baseball emerged as it looks today.

By the way -- my singing group in Washington, Fair Game, just called me. Much to my great envy they are singing the National Anthem at the Orioles-Red Sox game in Camden Yards in just a moment -- we are somewhat regulars at O's games, though obviously since I have moved from washington my opportunities to sing with them have been increasingly rare. They are going to call me back momentarily and that little sound coming from Don's pocket will be me singing into my cellphone from across the Atlantic.

Update: They (We -- I did sing along) were absolutely fantastic. My buttons are bursting. Go Sox!!!



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Derek Charles Catsam - 7/12/2005

Four against the Yanks, actually . . .


Derek Charles Catsam - 7/12/2005

Chris and Van --
I'd encourage you both to check out the Thorn article -- these are jis discoveries, not mine, but some of the key differences came in where the batsman stood (apparently in the Mass game the batsman stood at a weird location). In the Mass game, the batsman was like a cricketer who could hit the ball in any direction, and the game was played until one team rached 100 -- some suggest this led to its demise, as it was often tmes a long and drawn out process. In the Mass game, to get an out (and there was one out an "inning" if you will -- on a ball hit on the fly, you had to catch it in the air, akin to a popo- or line-out. Of course the New Yorkers, being an inferior lot, could catch it on one bounce. My favorite difference? Came in something called "splashing". The defensive team could get a player out by hitting him with the ball when he was between bases, much like you might do with whiffle ball or kickball as a child. This was part of the Mass game.

My friend Rob likes to make fun of me for attending "glee club." In Texas my options have been fewer, though I did sing in the new university chorus in the fall -- rehearsals clashed with my schedule in the spring, but they want and need basses, so hopefully we will work something out for this fall.

My Sox were wretched ending the first half as well. We start off with three against the Yanks on Thursday, though.

dc


chris l pettit - 7/12/2005

You can serenade me anytime...on a related note, I did musical theater when I was younger, so I probably have no right to tease...

I am also curious about what you have discovered regarding the differences between the NY and Mass...and why didnt Chicago get a say in all this (rhetorical question)?

Your Sox? Mine just got swept by the A's...no 2nd half swoon...no 2nd half swoon...

CP


Van L. Hayhow - 7/11/2005

Never mind the singing for a moment (don't get me wrong, I love music) but what where the differences between the NY and the Mass. versions of the game?


Derek Charles Catsam - 7/11/2005

I cannot even tell you how jealous I was, even if I was there in quiet, pocket-muted voice!
I have read some stuff about the anthem, but not a book-length project -- go for it!
dc


Don Graves - 7/11/2005

While I won't vouch for his choice of baseball teams, he can more than hold his own in the vocal world as a basso profundo. Of course I'm biased since I belong to Derek's group.

I wonder if anyone has taken a historical perspective on the performance of the national anthem at sporting events. If not then perhaps it might be the theme for my first book.

By the way, Derek, the performance was hugely fun (as always)!

Don


Derek Charles Catsam - 7/11/2005

Chris --
Music has always been a big part of my life. I sang weith several of the guys in Fair Game when I was in college, and when I moved to DC in 2000 I rejoined them in their new configuration. I will be singing with them again, I hope, when I am in DC in August and then in November at one of their weddings.

My Sox stink at the current moment.

dc


chris l pettit - 7/11/2005

Why is it that I picture your singing to be something like the African "jackass" penguins down here in Cape Town? hahahahahahaha...

You still need to change your Sox...

CP