Blogs > Cliopatria > The Historical Society

Jun 5, 2006

The Historical Society




From Thursday through Sunday, The Historical Society held its biennial national conference at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Launched to great fanfare in 1998, it was intended as an alternate to the American Historical Association and the Organization of American Historians. While it could not hope to replace the traditional organizations in services (particularly, job placement), it appealed to a substantial number of historians who had been alienated from the mainstream organizations in the culture wars and by what some historians regarded as their neglect of traditional fields, such as constitutional, diplomatic, intellectual, military, and political history especially. In many respects, THS paralleled The Association of Literary Scholars and Critics' challenge to the MLA. Interestingly, one of its prime achievements has been in launching The Valve, which serves as a hub for literary blogging, much like Cliopatria does for historical blogging. THS also promised to appeal to graduate students by meeting at university sites, where housing and meals might be had less expensively. While there was some suspicion that it would be dominated by conservatives, the suspicion was largely unjustified because it welcomed historians of all political persuasions, so long as they were willing not to insist on a political agenda for the organization, itself.

I participated in launching THS and its first conference at Boston University in 1999. In subsequent years, some of us who were active in organizing it lost interest in it. Richard Jensen, who fathered H-Net, and I were among them. I've made my criticism of THS known at Cliopatria. The promise that it would be active from the ground up has largely failed, as its regional affiliates have mostly collapsed; and holding its 2004 conference at the Spruce Point Inn near Boothbay Harbor, Maine, betrayed the promise to graduate students and younger faculty members to hold its conferences at easily accessible and relatively inexpensive sites. Yet, by meeting at Chapel Hill in 2006, THS seems to have revisited that promise. It should also get credit for putting many of the papers for the conference on-line, there to be read by those who attend its gatherings and those who would not. Under the general theme,"Globalization, Empire, and Imperialism in Historical Perspective," there are a wide variety of topics offered. Go over and have a look. There's almost certainly something that will interest you. The advantages of posting papers on the net in advance of conferences are immediately obvious. It should help to free presenters from a text to engage an audience with a more vital summary of their argument and encourage more active discussion. In that respect, the AHA and the OAH should be following the example set by THS.



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Jeff Vanke - 6/9/2006

Thanks. I'm still working my way through the June Journal. Proudman's takedown of Armitage's AHR article on British Empire is breathtaking.


Charles V. Mutschler - 6/8/2006

I have been pleased with the content of THS publications. I have found them to be well worth my time, even when the articles are outside my fields of specialization.
Keep up the good work.

Charles V. Mutschler


Ralph E. Luker - 6/7/2006

Thanks very much, Jeff, for really helpful feedback on THS. That's just the sort of exchange in comments that serves all of Cliopatria's readers very well. I disagreed with Gene when our Georgia/Florida region was set up because its organizer was located in the boonies, well away from any metro area. I do think that an Atlanta area regional organization might work. Unfortunately, I don't now have any institutional base from which I might work to set up a regional meeting.


Jeff Vanke - 6/7/2006

Ralph,

The state of The Historical Society is best understood through its publications and conferences. Thank you for your kind words about our recent conference's content and online accessibility.

I consider myself a broadly interested historian, and I continue to get a better education in our Journal's articles than in AHR's. This month's _Journal of the Historical Society_ has the best succinct explanation of Nazism's popular appeal in the 1930s I've seen; were I still in the classroom, I would assign it in surveys.

Our bimonthly _Historically Speaking_ has no peer in the field of historical studies. It brings top historians, and other historically oriented scholars, into incisive debate on very important topics. These have included the role (or not) of Christianity in the rise of the West; Niall Ferguson and others on the merits and demerits of empire; and many others.... Anyone who hasn't seen Historically Speaking in the past few years has missed something extraordinary.

Your points about regional activities have some basis, but not for lack of meetings held all over two time zones. Metropolitan regions are more practical, but still with a lot of work. If you care to rejoin and organize a regional event in Atlanta, we'd be glad to work with you; it's been hard to find people to do this on a consistent basis.

Our 2004 Booth Bay conference probably seemed distant to those who didn't try to come, but those who did found it very accessible. They had subsidized transportation from Portland, and graduate students and others were able to share already moderately priced rooms.

As you know, my fleeting effort to start a THS blog quickly folded; I had nowhere near enough time to devote to it. HNN soon rose to the task. Thanks for your part in that.

Jeff Vanke
Secretary-Treasurer
The Historical Society