Blogs > Cliopatria > Things Noted Here and There

Jul 2, 2007

Things Noted Here and There




Carnival: History Carnival LIV is up at Rebecca Goetz's Historianess!

American Loyalists: Maya Jasanoff,"Loyal to a Fault," NYTM, 1 July, looks at the American opposition to the American Revolution and the legacy of the Loyalists' subsequent roles elsewhere in the British empire. Jasanoff is an associate professor of British history at Harvard and the author of Edge of Empire: Lives, Culture and Conquest in the East, 1750-1850. Her relatively conservative interpretation of the American Revolution, however, understates its dislocations, which were in some respects even greater than those of the French Revolution.

Stalin Papers: Bryon MacWilliams,"Yale U. Press Strikes Deal with Russian Archive to Open Stalin's Papers to Scholars," CHE, 2 July, announces an agreement between Yale UP and the Russian State Archives to make Stalin's papers available to researchers.

You're No Winston Churchill, George: Lynne Olson,"Why Winston Wouldn't Stand for W," Washington Post, 1 July, argues that Bush is more like Neville Chamberlain than Winston Churchill. Olson is the author of Troublesome Young Men, the young Conservatives who eventually forced Chamberlain's resignation and brought Churchill to power.

But, You're a Clement Attlee, Gordon Brown: John Sutherland,"The Democratic Intellectual," Guardian, 27 June, weighs the import of the new PM's influences as a historian and the first Prime Minister to have an earned doctorate.

Geek Corner: Danah Boyd,"Viewing American Class Divisions through Facebook and Myspace," Apophenia, 24 June, even got a notice from the CHE, but Valleywag and Andrew P. Keating, a grad student in modern history at UC, Berkeley, think it's the kind of bad pop-sociology that Tom Tomorrow mocked in David Brooks.



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


david maclaren mcdonald - 7/4/2007

At the risk of sounding a scapegrace, has Ms Jasanoff ever bothered to read any historiography dealing with the Republic's neighbour to the north? I believe that in precincts like New Brunswick and southern Ontario, her very well-written article would have been greeted with a resounding "Duh!" Not least by the scores of chapters of the UEL, no matter how their numbers may wane nowadays.

It says less about Jasanoff than it does about the apparent state of the narrative about your revolution, and American historians' overwhelming indifference to events north of their border, that this piece made it to the inside back-page of the New York Times. The Toronto Globe and Mail would have passed on information that Basil Fawlty once termed the "bleeding obvious," obvious, that is, north of forty-nine. But, then, today's celebration is premissed on the tyranny of George III--afraid that doesn't persuade a Canadian-born historian of Russia . . .


Alan Allport - 7/2/2007

It's a shame that, in their rush to associate or disassociate Bush with the Divine Winston, historians like Olson repeat these tired old caricatures about Wicked, Weak Old Neville. Anyone interested in a robust and provocative defense of Chamberlain might be interested in James Levy's interesting recent book Appeasement and Rearmament. BTW, it's 'Attlee', not 'Atlee.'