What This Country Needs is Another Doctoral Program in History
I'm going to forego any polemic about the proposal. Here are a couple of important links for consideration of it: the AHA's"History Doctoral Programs in the United States and Canada," which is searchable by institutional name, state or province, and specialization, and the USF Board of Trustee's working proposal for the new doctoral programs. The history proposal is the second one in attachment B.
Unlike North Dakota, Mississippi, Wisconsin, Illinois, and Ohio, Florida and Texas, which recently added a doctoral program at UT, El Paso, have had robust population growth. Like UT, El Paso, USF, with campuses at Tampa, St. Petersburg, Sarasota, and Lakeland, is in a part of the state that has no nearby doctoral program in history. To the north, both Florida State and the University of Florida have doctoral programs in history; and to the south, both Miami's public Florida International University and private University of Miami have doctoral programs in history. USF's proposal would offer central Florida a doctoral program in history. So, there's a population and a geographical rationale for the proposal. Is there a market rationale for it? Don't even ask. If it aims at having a conveniently located program for community college faculty in central Florida to get a terminal credential, maybe. That's one of the things that a strong M.A. program used to be about.