Torture and the Campaign
In particular, Dahlia Lithwick’s article on how the administration has worked deliberately to make torture acceptable deserves recognition, and a lot more press. I wish it would get enough press that torture and the corrupting of American became a campaign issue.
That’s unlikely, though. Consider John McCain. McCain has opposed torture. But his opposition is not so great that he’s willing to make it a major issue.
I think it significant that on his website there is no mention of torture in the section Human dignity and the Sanctity of Life. I guess he doesn’t want to offend any born-again conservatives who are looking for reassurance concerning abortion. As another exhibit of McCain’s lack of fervor on the issue, he is unwilling to limit the powers of a president who wants to torture people.
I would like to direct you to Barack Obama’s position against torture, but I cannot find a reference on his site. I can find no such statement on Hillary Clinton’s site, either. Maybe somewhere in some speech, there is a reference, but they are certainly not putting the issue of torture on the front burner. Why not?
We all know why not. Because there have always been a lot of Americans who thought that torture could be good, and Bush has increased their numbers. McCain has a bunch of these people in his own party, and neither Obama nor Clinton wants to alienate the batch in the ranks of the independents.
That does not mean that this election offers no hope. None of the remaining candidates are likely to want to expand on Bush’s perfidy. They all would likely ratchet torture back. But a power like this, once legitimized, will tempt future presidents. That is why McCain’s vote was so wrong. There is a difference between maintaining options and maintaining destructive temptations.