Blogs > Cliopatria > "Is The Universe Friendly?"

Aug 22, 2004

"Is The Universe Friendly?"




There's a footnote in my latest book manuscript which runs to a page and a half of single-space text. That conceit was necessary for all the citations needed to make a fairly simple point about the question:"Is the universe friendly?"

The question was posed in sermons by Martin Luther King (12/12/1965) and in sermons by his predecessor at Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery, Vernon Johns (VI, 6), on whom I am currently at work. Students oftheir rhetoric had noted that both preachers posed the question and wondered whether one borrowed it from the other or both borrowed it from someone else. What I found was that almost every major mainstream American Protestant preacher (MAPP) in the 20th century probably had a sermon, somewhere in his files, that posed the question:"Is the universe friendly?"

It was possible to determine that King was not dependent on Johns for the sermonic inspiration because there were two different traditions of attribution and reference for the question. In 1917, Harry Emerson Fosdick, who would become probably the 20th century's most influential MAPP (King, at least, thought so), published a sermon in which he posed the question. In subsequent decades, John Sutherland Bonnell, Charles Reynolds Brown, Halford E. Luccock, Ernest Fremont Tittle, and Leslie D. Weatherhead followed Fosdick with sermons that asked"Is the Universe Friendly?" You can be reasonably sure that they were borrowing it from Fosdick for two reasons: first, like him, they attributed the question to the 19th century English poet, literary critic, and psychic researcher, Frederic William Myers (1843-1901); and, second, like him, they usually referred to the question as"the riddle of the Sphinx," a phrase from Sophocles's"Oedipus Rex." Martin Luther King attributed the question to Frederic William Myers.

But there was a different tradition of sermonic attribution and reference for the question. In 1931, Vernon Johns preached a sermon at New York's Union Theological Seminary in which he asked:"Is the universe friendly?" Whenever Johns took that sermonic leap, he attributed the question – not to Frederic William Myers – but to the German zoologist and a-theist, Ernst H. P. Haeckel (1834-1919). Haeckel was an aggressive advocate of the theory of evolution, coined the German word which is translated as"ecology," and fathered the now discredited theory that"ontology recapitulates phylogeny." Referring to the title of Haeckel's book, The Riddle of the Universe at the Close of the Nineteenth Century, Johns called the question – not"the riddle of the Sphinx" – but"the riddle of the universe." Following Johns, John Haynes Holmes, James Henry Breasted, the noted Egyptologist, and Charles L. Wallis attributed the question to Haeckel and called it"the riddle of the universe" or"the riddle of life."

It took a page and a half of single spaced text to document all of this. Incidentally, I never did find a source for either Frederic William Myers or Ernst H. P. Haeckel actually asking the question,"Is the universe friendly?" But you can imagine my surprise when I googled it recently. I got nearly 400 hits. Most of them attributed the question either to Albert Einstein or Gotthold Lessing! I was reminded of something Einstein actually did say:"Many things which go under my name are badly translated from the German or are invented by other people."



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Van L. Hayhow - 8/23/2004

As to his comment about people mistranslating or making up statements attributed to him, I am reminded of a comment made by Yogi Berra some years ago: "I didn't say all those things I said." I like this version better. I think I saw in an SI article but its been many years and I am no longer sure of the source.


Oscar Chamberlain - 8/23/2004

I'm not sure that our current political discourse supports the notion of a friendly universe. I wonder if they do it differently in the stars?


Ralph E. Luker - 8/22/2004

Ahh, to the best of my recollection and regardless of their attributions or references, all of the preachers, except Holmes, a Unitarian, and the historian, Breasted, answered in the affirmative. What interested me, of course, was that Johns was the earliest source I could find who attributed the question to Haeckel. It is quite plausible that Holmes, who was pastor of NYC's Community Church, heard Johns preaching at Union, borrowed the attribution and question from Johns for his book, and that Breasted got it from Holmes. Almost certainly, Wallis would have gotten it from Holmes.


Jonathan Dresner - 8/22/2004

I might say 'inscrutable' rather than 'indifferent' but I would agree that the (verifiable) evidence is indeterminate.

The question I was really asking, actually, was what answer did King and Johns come to on the question? Were the two sermonic strains in agreement on the answer, or did the fact that one came from a mystic and one from a monistic atheist (I looked them up, yeah) not affect the answer given by Christian sermonizers?


Ralph E. Luker - 8/22/2004

Good question, Jonathan! On one level, at least, it strikes me as an extraordinarily naive question. The evidence, it seems to me, is that the universe is utterly indifferent.


Jonathan Dresner - 8/22/2004

That's all very interesting: good historical work.

But you leave out the answer: is, in fact, the universe friendly?