Blogs > Cliopatria > Of Brains, Hands, and the Links Between.

May 26, 2009

Of Brains, Hands, and the Links Between.




My Dear Brother just sent me a link to this article by Matthew B. Crawford, author of the forthcoming Shop Class as Soulcraft: An Inquiry Into the Value of Work. Reminds me of Robert Pirsig... just less depressing.

Gotta say, it really resonates with me. In my younger (and poorer) days, I spent a lot of time"wrenching" on my own car (out of necessity) and for friends (out of desire for beer and pizza). I was far from a professional mechanic, but I could fix lots of stuff that it would otherwise cost of lot of money to pay a professional to attend to.

Unlike Crawford, however, I found working on cars far less rewarding than teaching and writing. That said, one of the things that struck me about it was just how differently you had to think in order to be good at each. Teaching and writing require a certain"open brain" thought process for me.

There is no harm to bouncing from one idea to the next... then backing up to collect and organize them. Working on cars, however, demanded a much more methodical and cautious approach. This was in no small part because a botched brake job could kill you (or somebody else), or because simply being careless could easily result in a nasty cut or a missing appendage.

This is probably a partial explanation as to why so many academics are a bit on the ditzy side, while mechanics (at least those with all their fingers) seem to be very rooted and practical.

Anyway, Crawford's article definately rings true in terms of just how rewarding a good repair can be, and just how smart you need to be to pull a really good fix off. And, it reminds me that I want to write a book about car culture in West Africa... with a chapter on just how smart the mechanics are.



comments powered by Disqus

More Comments:


Mike Zorn - 5/26/2009

Mechanics &c (including engineers) are "rooted and practical" because when you're done fixing it, either the motor runs and you drive off into the sunset, or you don't.

With academics, on the other hand, if you get the details of a philosophy wrong, the worst that happens is that you get into more arguments with your colleagues.

Unless, of course, you're a power-mad dictator.


Jonathan Jarrett - 5/26/2009

I would definitely agree about the satisfaction of fixing something right, but would add that this is a thing that those of us who occasionally have to make computers do our humanities bidding also get to experience when something `clever', that someone more capable could have done without thinking in a quarter of the time, turns out to work. So I don't think one has to be smart to know what you mean, just willing to try and do something when you're not sure you can.


K Woestman - 5/26/2009

This reminds all of us how many different types of intelligences there are and that "book smart" is not the only determinant.