Supreme Court 
-
-
SOURCE: The New Yorker
7/26/2021
Can Affirmative Action Survive the Supreme Court?
by Nicholas Lemann
The moderate Republican appointee has always served as the Justice to protect modest versions of affirmative action. What will happen in a pending case now that such Justices are gone from the court? The historical trajectory of supposedly meritocratic admissions offers clues.
-
-
SOURCE: Washington Post
7/16/2021
Why Let the Supreme Court Dominate Democracy?
by Nikolas Bowie
Liberals have been conditioned to look to the Supreme Court of Brown v. Board of Education as a protector of democracy. What if the court's dominant historical legacy is the body of decisions that enabled the rise of Jim Crow in the first place?
-
-
SOURCE: Vox
7/21/2021
How America Lost the Commitment to the Right to Vote
"The Supreme Court, Justice Elena Kagan lamented in a dissenting opinion earlier this month, 'has treated no statute worse' than the Voting Rights Act. She’s right."
-
-
7/18/2021
The 1906 Decision in Hodges v. United States Shows the Error of Leaving Fundamental Rights to the States
by William H. Pruden III
The Court ruled that the 13th Amendment did not create a federal right to fairly contracted labor, and called for Black workers to "take their chances with other citizens in the states where they should make their homes," despite the plain determination of those citizens to oppress and expolit them.
-
-
SOURCE: Southern Spaces
7/12/2021
Undoing the Voting Rights Act
by Steve Suitts
Samuel Alito ventured far from the legislative intent of Congress's 1982 update to the Voting Rights act, making it much more difficult to challenge restrictive state voting laws.
-
-
7/11/2021
How Historians Convinced SCOTUS that the NCAA's Idea of Amateurism is a Myth
by Ronald A. Smith
The Supreme Court was influenced by the work of a team of historians to reject the NCAA's arguments about amateurism and open the way for college athletes to profit from their names, images and likenesses – something history shows they did extensively before the NCAA's rules.
-
-
SOURCE: The Atlantic
7/8/2021
How Democrats Lost the Courts
"Some Democrats are starting to suspect that the story is simpler: They’ve been chumps. They have clung to norms Republicans long ago abandoned. They have championed moderates in order to appeal to their enemies, only to watch those moderates twist in the wind."
-
-
SOURCE: Election Law Blog
7/1/2021
Breaking and Analysis: Supreme Court on 6-3 Vote Rejects Voting Rights Act Section 2 Case in Brnovich Case— A Significant Weakening of Section 2
by Rick Hasen
"The conservative Supreme Court has taken away all the major available tools for going after voting restrictions. This at a time when some Republican states are passing new restrictive voting law."
-
-
7/4/2021
A Faulty Court Precedent on Selective Service Leaves the Last Legal Sex Discrimination in Place
by Kara Dixon Vuic
Since 1981, the Supreme Court has allowed the exclusion of women from Selective Service registration on the grounds that they were excluded from combat and thus not liable to be drafted. This position is out of date with the reality of women's military service, yet the current court declined to correct its error.
-
-
SOURCE: The Atlantic
6/15/2021
America’s ‘Great Chief Justice’ Was an Unrepentant Slaveholder
by Paul Finkelman
John Marshall's previous biographers have glossed over the extent of his slaveholding and his enthusiasm for the institution. Reappraisal of his legacy is entirely appropriate in light of new discoveries.
-
-
SOURCE: New York Times
6/14/2021
Supreme Court Rejects Sentence Reductions for Minor Crack Offenses
Justices disagreed about what lessons to draw from the history of the 1986 Crime Bill that created the sentencing disparity for crack cocaine offenses. Does the fact that some Black organizations at the time supported the law excuse its racist impact?
-
-
SOURCE: New York Times
6/5/2021
A Supreme Court Case Poses a Threat to L.G.B.T.Q. Foster Kids
by Stephen Vider and David S. Byers
State and local social service agencies for decades have been actively working to protect the safety and dignity of queer youth in the foster care system. A Supreme Court case threatens that progress in the name of "religious freedom."
-
-
SOURCE: The New Yorker
6/8/2021
The Importance of Teaching Dred Scott
A social media discussion among constitutional law professors has proposed minimizing the discussion of the racist language of the notorious Dred Scott decision. Does this do violence to historical understanding of the longstanding accommodation of the constitution to racism?
-
-
SOURCE: NPR
7/7/2021
The Supreme Court Justice Who Made History By Voting No on Racial Segregation
Peter Canellos's new book examines John Marshall Harlan, whose blistering dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson was on the losing side in 1896 but became a foundational text for civil rights and equal protection activism.
-
-
SOURCE: Harvard Law Today
5/19/2021
Plessy v. Ferguson at 125
Harvard Law School Professor Kenneth Mack explains what the shameful decision meant, and why it still matters in 2021.
-
-
SOURCE: The Atlantic
5/20/2021
The Abortion Fight Has Never Been About Just Roe v. Wade
by Mary Ziegler
"The abortion debate has never been about just Roe—and it’s never been about letting a popular majority have a say. What’s new is that this argument now meets a receptive Supreme Court for the first time in more than a generation."
-
-
SOURCE: Washington Monthly
5/5/2021
“Gimme an F!” Supreme Court Mulls the Case of the Cursing Cheerleader
by Garrett Epps
As the Supreme Court considers whether a school district has the authority ot punish a high school cheerleader for a profane social media rant made off campus, the author wonders if legal arguments about schools' authority are overshadowing schools' obligations to prepare students for citizenship.
-
-
5/2/2021
FDR's Court Packing Plan Backfired in the South. Will Biden Repeat The Error?
by James C. Cobb
FDR's court packing efforts were based in a miscalculation of the president's political capital, especially with southern Democrats. It seems like Joe Biden is working to avoid similar overreach.
-
-
SOURCE: New York Times
4/25/2021
Split-Second Decisions: How a Supreme Court Case Shaped Modern Policing
The SCOTUS decision in Graham v. Connor granted broad deference to police officers' judgment about the necessity of use of force; activists now recognize the decision as an impediment to prosecuting officers for abusive actions.
-
-
SOURCE: The New Republic
4/15/2021
The Democrats’ Court-Packing Plan Doesn’t Make Any Sense
Writer Matt Ford argues that the proposed Judiciary Act will fail to address the political problems that the Democrats are reacting to. Is there a better approach?