The Men Who Spied on Nixon: New Details Reveal Extent of 'Moorer-Radford Affair'
Newly declassified White House documents shed light on a unique crisis in American history: when investigators working for President Richard Nixon discovered that the Joint Chiefs of Staff used a stenographer to spy on civilian command during the Vietnam War.
A Navy stenographer assigned to the National Security Council during the Nixon administration"stole documents from just about every individual that he came into contact with on the NSC," according to newly declassified White House documents.
The two-dozen pages of memoranda, transcripts and notes -- once among the most sensitive and privileged documents in the Executive Branch -- shed important new details on a unique crisis in American history: when investigators working for President Richard Nixon discovered that the Joint Chiefs of Staff, using the stenographer as their agent, actively spied on the civilian command during the Vietnam War.
The episode became known as"the Moorer-Radford affair," after the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs at the time, the late Admiral Thomas H.
Moorer, and the stenographer involved, Navy Yeoman Charles Radford. The
details first surfaced in early 1974 as part of the Watergate revelations,
but remained obscure until historians in the 1990s and this decade began
fleshing out the episode.
comments powered by Disqus
- New Hampshire professors at odds with library over discarded books
- Troubled history fuels Japan-China tension
- Independent Scotland's last gasp forgotten in Panama jungle
- LBJ was the ‘most-threatened president in American history’
- New exhibit at the World War I Museum ... Over by Christmas: August-December 1914
- Ken Burns on Colbert to promote his new documentary, "The Address"
- UC Santa Barbara History Department featuring a series on the Great Society at 50
- Historians are trying to recover censored texts from World War I poets
- Diane Ravitch blasts the NYT for failing to understand the controversy over Common Core
- Mormon history professors debate atheists in bid to foster greater understanding