9-30-02
Mr. Briley teaches at Sandia Prepatory school in New Mexico.
As schools begin to reopen all over the country, teachers, especially those in
history, will express disappointment over how much their students have forgotten
during the summer. But perhaps we are too quick to chide our young people for
not maintaining intellectual engagement. It may well be that their forgetfulness
simply reflects the historical and cultural amnesia which seems to characterize
modern memory in the United States.
As we bemoan low test scores and the short attention span of our youth, perhaps
we should stop blaming video games and reflect upon our failure to examine the
historical record and hold our leaders accountable The summer's headlines regarding
corporate greed, a declining stock market, escalating violence in the Middle East,
President Bush's demand that the Palestinians disavow Yasir Arafat, and an impending
invasion of Iraq indicate that many American citizens are all too quick, like
our school children, to forget and disengage. The school children may be taking
their cues from the adults, and it's time we all went back to school in an effort
to revitalize American democracy.
The accounting scandals surrounding such corporate giants as Enron and WorldCom
have shaken investor confidence in the stock market. Corporate greed is shrinking
the retirement accounts of many middle and working class Americans, whose hard
work and plans for retirement have been shattered by C.E.O.'s stock options, creative
accounting, and financial parachutes. The Bush administration has attempted to
disassociate itself from these corporate scandals by taking a get tough approach
to white collar crime, yet the President and Vice-President Cheney, while perhaps
not guilty of criminal behavior, are products of the corporate culture which brought
us to this sad state of affairs.
During the 2000 campaign, Ralph Nader, as presidential candidate of the Green
Party, focused his candidacy on the issue of corporate responsibility. Yet, Nader
struggled to get his message out to the American people. He was ignored by the
mainstream media and was not allowed to participate in the presidential debates.
In a classic Catch-22 situation, Nader was nixed from the debates because his
candidacy failed to garner enough support in public opinion polls, while being
disqualified from the debates guaranteed that the Green Party candidate would
not get the media exposure he needed to rise in the polls. Now we know that Nader
was right on target with his concerns regarding corporate behavior, but the media
still fail to make this connection. The prophet Nader remains neglected, and this
summer's national Green Party convention in Philadelphia was overlooked by America's
corporate media. It is as if the Nader crusade to restore corporate responsibility
never happened, and we are shocked to learn of corporate executive misbehavior.
This state of historical amnesia is also apparent in America's response to the
tragic escalating violence in the Middle East between Israelis and Palestinians.
President Bush has called for the creation of an evolving Palestinian state; however,
the president insists that the Palestinian people must disassociate themselves
from Chairman Arafat. There are, indeed, many problems with Arafat, but by what
right does the United States dictate to the Palestinians their leadership choices?
It is this tendency toward a selective democracy, usually friendly to American
corporate interests, which has so often led the United States into trouble.
Bush's pronouncement to the Palestinians that Arafat must go is reminiscent of
President Woodrow Wilson's declaration that he was going to teach the Mexicans
to elect good men. This policy led Wilson to invade our neighbor to the south
twice, with the last incursion antagonizing the Mexican people while American
troops engaged in a futile search for Poncho Villa. In more recent history, the
United States has intervened to overthrow or destabilize democratically-elected
regimes in Iran and Guatemala in the 1950s and Chile in the 1970s.
Before President Bush lectures other nations on the lessons of democracy, it is
well worth noting that the president lost a popular election and was elevated
to the nation's highest office by a 5 to 4 Supreme Court decision. The election
of 2000, which raised serious questions about the nature of American democracy,
is all too often part of our historical amnesia. The Bush tax cut is also contributing
to a growing federal deficit, as we try to expand the military spending in the
war on terrorism while curtailing domestic expenses. The economic promise of the
Bush financial tax windfall has quickly been erased from public memory.
The projected invasion of Iraq by the United States should produce a strong sense
of déjà vu. We are almost daily reminded that Sadaam Hussein is
a threat to his neighbors and the United States. Conveniently forgotten is the
fact that during the Reagan presidency, Hussein was our man in Baghdad, checking
the expansion of the extremist Iranians. We hear much today about the Iraqi dictator
using poison gas on his own people, yet when these events occurred there was little
protest from Washington. However, with the invasion of Kuwait, Hussein became
a threat to the steady flow of Middle Eastern oil. Bush the elder put together
an impressive international coalition; however, he was unsuccessful in toppling
the Iraqi strongman. His son is now insistent upon finishing the job.
Before endorsing the president's invasion plans it might be useful to again shed
our historical amnesia. Getting into a war is easy, but devising an exit strategy
is complex, as politicians found with the Vietnam War. While the Gulf War of Bush
the elder enjoyed initial popular support, it is well worth recalling the disillusionment
of veterans regarding the government's failure to acknowledge Gulf War Syndrome.
Also, current invasion plans for Iraq lack international support and may further
destabilize the volatile Middle Eastern political climate, making the world less
secure for Americans.
Indeed, it seems this summer that we are paying a heavy price for our selective
memory and failure to stay engaged. Just as we would like our school children
to remember their lessons and become more involved in the classroom, as American
citizens we must offer a better role model and be ever vigilant in fostering our
democracy, demanding more from ourselves, the media, and our leaders. We must
reclaim our historical memory, for the price of historical/cultural amnesia is
too great a price to pay. As the events of September 11 and this summer well document,
we ignore the past at our own peril and that of our children.