With support from the University of Richmond

History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.

Supreme Court Nominee Was on the Side of Minorities in Key Cases

President Obama's nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court, Sonia Sotomayor, has a relatively thin record on cases involving higher education. But in two decisions that could have implications for higher education, she has sided with members of minority groups—in one case supporting a government hiring policy that would benefit African-Americans, and in the other supporting an individual student who challenged a grading policy as discriminatory.

In a third case, Judge Sotomayor supported an individual's right to file complaints against a university regardless of the merits of the suit....

In a case with more-direct applications to higher education, Judge Sotomayor was on another three-judge panel of the Second Circuit court that in 2001 unanimously upheld a trial-court jury's verdict against Queens College, which is part of the City University of New York, and the $50,000 in damages it awarded to the plaintiff.

In that case, Tolbert v. Queens College, the trial-court jury had found that the college had discriminated against a black graduate student on the basis of race by failing him on his final examinations, while giving Chinese students who spoke English as a second language more "slack" in completing their exams. The trial-court judge reversed the jury's verdict, but the Second Circuit appellate panel ruled that there was strong-enough evidence to sustain the original verdict. Judge Sotomayor did not write the opinion in that case.
Read entire article at Chronicle of Higher Ed