;



AUPresses Statement on US Executive Order on Combatting Race and Sex Stereotyping

Breaking News
tags: racism, diversity, Donald Trump, critical race theory, University Presses



As a global community of scholarly publishers dedicated to the advancement of knowledge, the Association of University Presses (AUPresses) is appalled by the Executive Order on Combatting Race and Sex Stereotyping, issued by the US President on September 22.

By labeling difficult conversations about race and privilege as “stereotyping,” accusing citizens of advancing “pernicious and false beliefs” in areas of legitimate historical interpretation, and attempting to ban members of the federal workforce, uniformed services, and government contractors—as well as recipients of federal grants—from conducting anti-racist training, this order has the potential to set chilling and frankly un-American precedents. If fully implemented, it not only could slow the arduous, but vital, progress towards equity, justice, and inclusion in this country’s workplaces and public spaces, but also could hamper the essential exercise of intellectual freedom, through which new fields of inquiry, such as critical race studies, are articulated and make valuable contributions to the breadth of human knowledge.

This executive order claims to support “equal dignity” for every person, but would present serious barriers to the achievement of this goal. The AUPresses Statement on Equity and Anti-Racism expresses our members’ intent to recognize, value, and encourage diversity in our community and, importantly, aims to guide our future actions in this area. In part, it asserts that upholding equity, justice, and inclusion requires introspection, honesty, and reform of current practices, the interests they serve, and the people and perspectives they exclude. Forthright and thoroughgoing examinations of structural racism are only the first steps to meaningful change. To stymie these necessary actions in the manner prescribed by this executive order is to maintain a hostile status quo.

Read entire article at Association of University Presses

comments powered by Disqus